43
submitted 1 year ago by dpunked@feddit.de to c/boardgames@feddit.de
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FMT99@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

I may be in the minority here when I say I don't see the problem. AI trained on millions of publicly available images used to speed up the concept stage of development seems like fair use to me. Like the developer says, commercial artists have always used other folks work to speed up their development, that sounds more problematic to me than drawing inspiration from a huge dataset.

[-] FlowVoid@midwest.social 7 points 1 year ago

"Fair use" has a specific meaning in copyright law. If something replaces the need for something else in the market, it's almost certainly not fair use. Generative AI replaced the need to hire an original artist.

[-] Stuka@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

That would be relevant if we were talking about copyright law at all.

[-] FlowVoid@midwest.social 6 points 1 year ago

Parent comment was literally referring to fair use.

[-] kmkz_ninja@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I don't think they were referring to fair use in copyright law. Just that it's fair to use.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2023
43 points (90.6% liked)

boardgames

5853 readers
3 users here now

Everything boardgames

Please stick to English for posts and comments

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS