submitted 1 year ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

22 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 21 points 1 year ago

So the museum made much more money thanks to the publicity but is still demanding their money back?

[-] tomten@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

They gave the artist a bunch of money that was supposed to be used in the piece and was to be returned once done. It wasnt used nor returned.

[-] Pregnenolone@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah but the art piece he did produce was much better

[-] atlasraven31@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

It makes a statement.

[-] Lols@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

its a breach of contract regardless

[-] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

I argue the money was used in the piece. The fact that it was missing from the canvas was part of the artistic statement.

load more comments (18 replies)

this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2023

96 points (93.6% liked)

World News

32163 readers

533 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS