177
submitted 1 year ago by silas@programming.dev to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Fizz@lemmy.nz 17 points 1 year ago

It often seems cyber sec staff write reports on what should be done with no understanding of why and this leads to them fretting over things that are not actual vulnerabilities.

[-] darth_helmet@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 year ago

200 vulnerabilities, 2-3 that might actually be exploitable, and no prioritization. But look at these metrics!

this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2023
177 points (98.9% liked)

Asklemmy

44196 readers
1220 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS