435
submitted 11 months ago by Wilshire@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] HerrBeter@lemmy.world 29 points 11 months ago

I wonder what we gave up for Turkey to sign it. Maybe it was enough for Kristersson to celebrate his 60th birthday with a purposefully made confidential bill to taxpayers.

Funny how his government always seem to transform things that were or should be public to confidential.

Like the secret electricity support, so the ones who used much electricity when the grid was strained got a cashback. I forget the name but some people apparently had to keep their mansions and fifteen swimmingpools heated. Guess we aren't equal after all..

[-] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

It's what we voted for (I didn't vote for them, I mean as a collective).

[-] HerrBeter@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

NATO should've been put as a separate issue public vote, whatever it's called in English. To make an international example, in the US they can vote for big shit or the lesser shit, so people vote for lesser shit, but that doesn't mean they want lesser shit policies.

Imo it's a big wrangled to say we voted for this, when we vote for packages and our options are severely limited. Maybe you agree?

[-] Vaniljkram@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

We have representative democracy meaning we elect politicians to make decisions for us. While we do have the option to vote on single issue topics it's unusual, and there are more and less suitable topics for the public to vote on. Voting on the NATO issue is probably the least suitable. Much of the basis for entering NATO are secrets not revealed to the public. And considering Russia managed to tamper with the us election, can you imagine what impact they could have on a vote like this?

[-] HerrBeter@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

We've had public votes for single issues before, like nuclear power, euro, and EU.

Russian and in extension Chinese influence is mostly astroturfing opinions. They give money to entities like PragerU and others to push any conflicting information. Hence the MAGA cult.

Better believe in information war, herr Vaniljkram, you're in one.

[-] Vaniljkram@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Did you want to explain why it would be a good idea to have a public vote on NATO?

[-] HerrBeter@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Because then we'd at least have the option, and the people who are to be sent to wars get to actually weigh what they feel.

It's not perfect, but it'd be better

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2024
435 points (99.3% liked)

World News

39371 readers
2350 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS