46
Why is SYSRQ Disabled on most consumer distributions? (lemmy.ml)
submitted 10 months ago by Artemis_Mystique@lemmy.ml to c/linux@lemmy.ml
14 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I use fedora on a 11ish year old laptop(It had decent specs for its time).

recently i encountered an issue while playing a 11 hour webm video(celluloid flatpak) i had downloaded off youtube,

the screen froze, I could still hear the video sound playing, but the system wasn't responding to any keyboard presses(Wouldnt switch over to TTY2-4),

I had heard about REISUB and tried it, but it obviously didnt work, after about 2:30 mins the system unfroze and i was shuffled Across numerous TTY's and the video closed as i had invoked CLTRL+Q

I am not here for a resolution to my problem The issue is reproducible by loading numerous instances of videos whose combined watch time Exceeds about 7-8 hours

I am more curious as to why SYSRQ is disabled and are there any consequences in enabling it(Security Wise)?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Atemu@lemmy.ml 27 points 10 months ago

There are some obvious security risks involved in fully enabling the SysRq key. In addition to forcing reboots and the like, it can be used to dump the contents of the CPU registers, which could theoretically reveal sensitive information. Since using it requires physical access to the system (unless you go out of your way), most desktop users will probably consider the level of risk acceptable. That said, make sure you fully understand the implications of enabling it and the dynamics of the larger context in which your system is operating before you turn SysRq all the way on.

https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Keyboard_shortcuts#Enabling

I don't care about this so sysrq is enabled on all of my desktop systems.

[-] Artemis_Mystique@lemmy.ml 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

That said, make sure you fully understand the implications of enabling it

Are there any other risks to worry about except abuse due to physical access?

The wording makes it feel kinda Ominous, can improper use potentially lead to a borked system?

[-] Atemu@lemmy.ml 15 points 10 months ago

Improper use of sysrq can absolutely lead to a borked system or other breakages as it allows you to initiate unclean shutdowns or kill all processes which can have consequences.

If your system is stuck though, sysrq is often your only option short of hardware shutdown.

[-] drwho@beehaw.org 4 points 10 months ago

Especially if you're prone to accidentally hitting SysReq instead of PrintSc by accident.

[-] Artemis_Mystique@lemmy.ml 2 points 10 months ago

but on my keyboard they are the same key? Hitting ALT+PRTSC took an instant screenshot

[-] 0v0@sopuli.xyz 12 points 10 months ago

Yes, for example, syncing on a kernel panic could lead to data corruption (which is why we don't do that). For the same reason REISUB is not recommended anymore: The default advice for a locked-up system should be SysRq B.

load more comments (2 replies)
this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2024
46 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

48721 readers
971 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml
nooter692@lemmy.ml
MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml
cypherpunks@lemmy.ml
cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz