16
submitted 1 year ago by gsa32@lemmy.world to c/firefox@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] PlasticExistence@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Well... that was a disappointing read. Those questions deserve some answers.

I take a small exception to the author's inflation of figures. They claim things like "nearly half a million dollars" when the actual referenced total was less than $400k. The same with saying the CEO's $5 million bonus was all of the $7 million Mozilla took in as donations from users. Even if unintentional, it raises questions about the author's motivations - not that Mozilla has a spotless record or are beyond being questioned about their finances.

[-] Engywuck@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

It's odd to me how this articleis being silenced/removed or downplayed by the entire tech community. It looks like people sinerely believe tha Mozilla can't do no wrong or that Mozilla is above any judgment while other entities are being systematically (and hypocritically) attacked for personal matters (e.g., Brave's CEO).

[-] nelsnelson@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Mozilla has positioned itself as a mostly pro-privacy organization, and appears to be one of a dwindling few web browser frameworks that do not intentionally cripple ad-blocking and tracker-blocking extensions.

If the entire tech community is downplaying negative press of Mozzila, then perhaps that suggests that the tech community has a bias for pro-privacy groups.

Is it really, then, such a surprise that this article is getting downplayed? It certainly seems like a bad omen for privacy-focused web client development, if the contents of the article are verified and eventually jeopardize the future of the Firefox project.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2023
16 points (62.1% liked)

Firefox

4221 readers
6 users here now

A community for discussion about Mozilla Firefox.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS