691
submitted 5 months ago by Zerush@lemmy.ml to c/science@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 91 points 5 months ago

This makes a strong case on the discovery side of the discovery vs. invention controversy.

Ironically, my dad idolized Pythagoras and the notion of discovering a scientific fundamental to be remembered for thousands of years, for which the secret is not to actually do science, but raise a cult of scientists who attribute their inventions to you. Like Thomas Edison.

[-] No1@aussie.zone 19 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

raise a cult

*cough* Elon Musk *cough*

[-] Jessvj93@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

Edison, Watson/Crick, Musk, Jobs....I hope today it's much harder to get away with being an idea stealing tool bag since the internet has competent archivers, sans working under a company that owns anything you make.

[-] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 months ago

As in turns out, Watson and Crick may not have actually stolen anything from Rosalind Franklin after all. If you're interested, I found an article I read regarding it about a year back. A couple of researchers provide some interesting info and context that make the original data stealing narrative less certain.

https://www.sciencenews.org/article/rosalind-franklin-dna-structure-watson-crick

load more comments (4 replies)
this post was submitted on 14 May 2024
691 points (99.4% liked)

Science

13115 readers
61 users here now

Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS