1292
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de 179 points 5 months ago

My psych often has people wait for their appointments. I'll be scheduled for 800, there at 740, get seen at 840.

And you know what? That's perfectly fine. I feel taken seriously, he listens, he asks, he quips, he shares his own experiences, he does all he can to make me comfortable telling him about the shit going on in my head. I'll work up the courage to tell him something I find hard to phrase and unpleasant to talk about and he takes it with a relaxed professionalism, waiting patiently for me to finish, asks questions (usually very precise ones, both unpleasant in how close to home they hit and reassuring in the implications that I'm not the only one with these issues) and looks for the best way to help me.

So when I sit in that waiting room, watching the minutes tick by, I imagine he's taking the same time with a different, far more difficult patient. Perhaps someone got slotted in for an emergency, perhaps someone needs blood drawn for a routine check and really, really hates needles, perhaps someone is having a breakdown... I don't know and I don't care what ails the other patients, but I know that I want them to receive the same quality of care as I do. To me, that's worth waiting for.

[-] JayTreeman@fedia.io 111 points 5 months ago

There's a movement inside of Healthcare to get the average Dr's office humming like a dentist. Which, if you're concerned with patient care at all, is impossible. You'll see it with posters saying only one issue per visit, which also greatly imperils the patient as sometimes a diagnosis will change based off one symptom. You've got a good attitude about this. Please share it

[-] wolfpack86@lemmy.world 58 points 5 months ago

This is the product of clinics being owned by corporations chasing a specific return, and not being owned by a local group of physicians who actually want to care for people.

Shop local applies.

[-] JayTreeman@fedia.io 20 points 5 months ago

We get the same issue in Ontario with family health teams. The structure of the corporation matters, but so does the funding model

[-] Timecircleline@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 months ago

Sometimes I wonder though if it's because drs get to bill OHIP per visit as well so if you try to squeeze more than one complaint in in a visit then they only get to bill once.

[-] JayTreeman@fedia.io 4 points 5 months ago

That is what I meant by the funding model. What we're talking about is fee for service. More service equals more money. There's other funding models though.

[-] Zagorath@aussie.zone 4 points 5 months ago

It's also a product of poor government funding models. We have universal healthcare in my country, and it works great for anything hospital-related. But GPs had the amount they get paid by the government frozen for nearly a decade as costs continued to rise, and once unfrozen, no effort was made to make up for the lost decade. So GPs are forced to either charge out the arse for private fees, or operate on a ruthless patient-unfriendly schedule to maximise throughput just to be able to make ends meet.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2024
1292 points (98.2% liked)

People Twitter

5401 readers
1600 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS