173
submitted 2 months ago by Emperor@feddit.uk to c/andfinally@feddit.uk

A woman was left "devastated" after her daughter's passport application was rejected because she was named after a Game of Thrones character.

Lucy, 39, from Swindon in Wiltshire, said the Passport Office initially refused the application for Khaleesi, six.

Officials said they were unable to issue a passport unless Warner Brothers gave permission because it owned the name's trademark. But the authority has since apologised for the error.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 32 points 2 months ago

This seems fucking daft. How do you refuse a name? Unless your name is a literal blank then you should be allowed any stupid name you desire.

[-] Jayjader@jlai.lu 6 points 2 months ago

Even a blank name can work for some; https://www.kalzumeus.com/2010/06/17/falsehoods-programmers-believe-about-names/ is a fun read if you've never encountered it before.

[-] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 2 points 2 months ago

I've only quickly read that. Kinda funny with reference to the Klingon Empire.

However this doesn't say anything about blank names. The closest it comes is point six.

  1. People’s names fit within a certain defined amount of space.

But I believe that is talking about an upper limit rather than a lower limit.

If your first and last name (or any combination of however many names you have) is literally blank then how do you expect to function in society? Let alone modern society.

You'll end up with an alias (which is essentially nickname) that someone assigns you that will become your de facto name.... and now you have a name .

[-] Jomega@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Point 40: "People have names".

load more comments (20 replies)
this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024
173 points (96.8% liked)

And Finally...

1023 readers
119 users here now

A place for odd or quirky world news stories.

Elsewhere in the Fediverse:

Rules:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS