222
Which protocol or open standard do you like or wish was more popular? (lemmy.ml)
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by cyclohexane@lemmy.ml to c/programming@programming.dev
274 comments fedilink hide all child comments

There are a couple I have in mind. Like many techies, I am a huge fan of RSS for content distribution and XMPP for federated communication.

The really niche one I like is S-expressions as a data format and configuration in place of json, yaml, toml, etc.

I am a big fan of Plaintext formats, although I wish markdown had a few more features like tables.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] arthur@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 month ago

GRPC for building APIs instead of REST. Type safety makes life easier

[-] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 8 points 1 month ago

The biggest problems with gRPC are:

  1. Very complicated. Way more complexity than you want in most cases.
  2. Depends on HTTP 2. I've seen people who weren't even doing web stuff reach for gRPC, and now boom you have a web server in your stack for now reason. Compare to Thrift which properly separates out encodings, transports, etc.
  3. Doesn't work from the web. There are actually two modifications to gRPC to make it work on the web which means you have three different incompatible versions of gRPC with different feature sets. IIRC some of them require setting up complex proxies, some don't support streaming calls, ugh. Total mess.

Plain HTTP can be type safe. Just publish JSON schema or Typespec files or even use Protobuf.

[-] arthur@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Your concerns are all valid, but about 1 and 3 there are possible solutions. I'm using Rust+Tonic to build an API and that's eliminate the necessity of proxies and it's very simple to use.

I know that it don't solve all problems, but IMHO is a question of adoption. Easier ~~told~~ tools will be develop for it.

[-] ulterno@lemmy.kde.social 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Depends on HTTP 2.

Doesn’t work from the web.

Am I the only one who is weirded out? Requiring a web server for something and then requiring another server if you want it to actually work on the web?
How expensive do people want to make their deployments?

load more comments (3 replies)
this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2024
222 points (98.3% liked)

Programming

17237 readers
524 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
snowe@programming.dev
Ategon@programming.dev
MaungaHikoi@lemmy.nz