25
submitted 3 days ago by Sunshine@lemmy.ca to c/linux@programming.dev
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] addie@feddit.uk 35 points 3 days ago

Finish the transition from X to Wayland?

[-] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I’m not a super-savvy user. Can someone explain to me why I should care about X vs Wayland? Everything seems to work with X, and as I’ve just read, many programs don’t support Wayland. So will this transition just lead to lots of broken software once someone decides they won’t ship with X by default anymore?

[-] FizzyOrange@programming.dev -5 points 2 days ago

You basically shouldn't until you are forced to move. Almost all of the improvements so far are in the internal architecture.

You might notice some tiny differences if you switch, like logging in doesn't show a black screen at any point, and window choosers when screen sharing show a (totally broken) grid of previews instead of a plain list of window titles.

Hopefully when X is fully dead (give it another 10 years) we'll see some actual improvements, e.g. RDP-style remote desktop, good support for multi-monitor, HDR, HiDPI, etc.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 days ago

I'm not sure if you have been paying attention but Wayland has come very far in the last year or two. It has XDG portals for screen sharing, HDR (early support), display scaling and plenty of other stuff.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2024
25 points (79.1% liked)

Linux

5511 readers
84 users here now

A community for everything relating to the linux operating system

Also check out !linux_memes@programming.dev

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS