368
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 4 points 5 days ago

And this is relevant how exactly?

[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

I'm asking is the response proportional to the damage? I never said I thought it wasn't harmful or that we shouldn't regulate access. Obviously many people are upset with the adult verification methods that these states are using, but is this a necessary evil or virtue signaling? All we know is that kids shouldn't view porn, so how far does that get taken? All the way to a complete ban? What's the measure of success even?

[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 5 points 5 days ago

ID checks to do porn have basically zero effect on minors' ability to view porn.

[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

Exactly. So I don't imagine lawmakers will quit there. And my previous posts weren't to say, "It's only crack. How bad can it be?" But more to say, "Let's define the problem before we try to fix it." Stating the problem as, "Kids are looking at porn," is oversimplifying and misses the cause and effect.

this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2025
368 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

60301 readers
2915 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS