1452
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] kamen@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

People can babble about water proofing, etc. There is no legitimate engineering problem.

Even if it was a legitimate problem, it's sad that only about half of the phones are certified waterproof even if almost all are sealed.

[-] Ado@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Why is that sad? I can understand why companies don’t want to pay just to get a certification when the phone itself is up to standards regardless

[-] kamen@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

"It's easier to make the phone waterproof if the battery is not user-serviceable" is a common argument; if it's really true, way more phones should be waterproof even if not IP-certified (which understandably costs money and raises the end price).

[-] ZiemekZ@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Samsung Galaxy S5 would like to have a word. IP67 while having user-detachable battery cover.

[-] kamen@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

One of the very few phones like this.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2023
1452 points (97.1% liked)

> Greentext

7598 readers
2 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS