419
Gaslight
Obstruct
Project
Naw. That tech is a little too modern for the GOP.
is still cutting edge by their standards.
I just ripped the bong so like
Maybe were in a black hole and all the information around is is getting perpetually condensed into a single point, and that's what the arrow of time is and that's why it goes in one direction only. Maybe everything felt still until we passed an event horizon if some higher dimension, and that popped a big bang in some sub dimensional 3d world with time as a vector proportional to the rate of compression.
And that's why time keeps feeling like it's moving faster. And why our universe appears to be infinitely expanding.
Alright time for work 😊
Uhm... stay safe at work, I guess.
They’re a school bus driver :(
They'll say anything. Oh look, he's in my state. I just saw a flier in my mailroom that spoke of a Democratic congress person in my area who supported a company over a woman who had been raped, therefore this congress person can't be trusted on abortion I believe it was. Paid for by a Republican something or other. I was surprised it actually had that in the name and not something more obscure. I don't know the incident being referenced, sadly. However, the fact they'd try to link this congress person and the bad decision she made on this particular case vs what the entire Republican party, including their opponent, has done/is doing and has pledged to do to weaken abortion rights nationwide is laughable. I see through it cause I know, but others might not. They might not look at the big picture. They might not look beyond what that fucking flier says. They'll try anything.
this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2024
419 points (99.5% liked)
politics
19022 readers
3459 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS