94

Pseudo-monopolies are great at extinguishing imagination like that, and tbh Google search (as I understand its basic setup) was only as good as it was thanks to timing and few really good competitors.

all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Brkdncr@artemis.camp 34 points 1 year ago

Did you sleep through the search engine wars? Not a single search engine was good. There were sites dedicated to sending your search to all of the search engines at once.

Google showed up and it was game over. Their ad sales took off, and then they came out with gmail with 1gb of free storage and everyone went nuts for it since trying to stay under 15mb for your local isp was a pain in the ass.

Google disrupted very hard and continued to do so in many ways for a long time.

[-] realitista@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

Yea but it's not the case today. I get as good or better results out of duck duck go, and bing is good too now. The only reason to continue using Google is if you love ads.

[-] ElectroVagrant@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Yep. Some of the replies here are getting tied up in Google/search engine history, which doesn't matter as much with how the space is now and how Google's being better in the past wasn't necessarily entirely good given that it destroyed competition and/or has deterred much competition.

Ideally there would have been some check to address the rise of their pseudo-monopoly on search to ensure the service it provided remained decent so we wouldn't be having this discussion, but "free" markets go brrr.

[-] sheogorath@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

For me it's still hit or miss when you're searching for specific troubleshooting error codes or programming. Sometimes Bing or DDG will miss the point entirely and show me things with no relation for my search query at all.

[-] realitista@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Interesting. There was a time when I noticed that DDG didn't scan as often and so wouldn't have the very latest news, but now they are functionally identical to me. If I don't find something on one, I'm pretty surprised how I don't find it in more or less the same way on the others

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe -3 points 1 year ago

"disrupted" 🤢

[-] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago

Annoyingly, Google has gotten so bad over the past year, that I basically give up trying to find a good result half the time. And the other half, I have to spend 10 minutes retrying search terms to find anything that either isn't an ad, an embedded side-scrolling bullshit thing, and irrelevant websites.

[-] Mr_Blott@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago

I've tried Kagi search a few times this last couple of weeks and was reasonably impressed. If it works out I'd be happy to pay a few pennies for better product recommendations

[-] scarabic@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Microsoft never stopped trying. They made a reasonably good product and even had some monopoly power behind it. But still couldn’t succeed.

[-] ElectroVagrant@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

To be clear, when referring to a reasonably good product, which iteration of their attempts are you describing?

[-] atomicpeach@pawb.social 9 points 1 year ago

I was informed about Kagi through one of the posts here and tried it out. It's quite amazing how much better it is compared to even DDG. I didn't mind DDG but it felt "old" but Kagi seems to prioritize user experience over everything else. It may not be free, but it's worth the cost for me.

[-] H3L1X@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

I used the trial and then just started paying for it. So far, it is much better results, and I like that they do not track you. Also, their small web lens has been fun to play around with.

[-] glue_snorter@lemmy.sdfeu.org 2 points 1 year ago

Another Kagi fan here. I pay $10 a month.

I'm a reasonably heavy search user, but have never hit the quota.

It's wonderful to have relevant results again.

The one thing it doesn't work for is shopping. From time to time I use Google. I should probably switch that to Bing, as the lesser of two evils.

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I dunno... if someone came around and made a site that works like Google did originally, I think they'd have a shot at taking over. Google has changed so much over the years, it's barely even recognizable anymore. One of the things that is pretty common with them, too, is taking something a lot of users like as-is, and then completely reworking the UI/UX until nobody wants to use it.

[-] promodel@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

kagi.com - I think they are taking their shot!

[-] Ddhuud@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Yes, the other part of the sucking is because of direct Google involvement.

[-] Willy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

timing is everything. always has been.

this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2023
94 points (90.5% liked)

Showerthoughts

30131 readers
1009 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    • 3.1) NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    • 3.2) Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    • 3.3) Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS