886
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago

No no no no, I think his strategy of directly antagonizing law enforcement is going to work and he should be encouraged to do so.. /s

[-] ki77erb@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

He's having a complete meltdown right now.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Otkaz@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Why get legal experts to weight in on this? That assumes he is listening to his counsel which we all know he is not. Need a phycologist to weight in on this instead to make any sense of it. I don't think his delusional narcissistic ass has the capacity to realize he is going to lose, but I'm not a legal expert or psychologist.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ksgt69@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

Between this and his lawyers "forgetting" to request a jury trial, this is gonna suck for him.

[-] 0110010001100010@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

🍿🍿🍿🍿🍺🍺🍺🍺

Grab one and enjoy the show!

[-] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago
[-] FARTYSHARTBLAST@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

"I have the worst lawyers..."

[-] PetDinosaurs@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

this

I still haven't figured out how he has anyone willing to represent him. It appears that he doesn't pay any of his bills. Like ever.

[-] Pseu@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Trump's PAC is paying his legal fees, not Trump himself. So far the Save America PAC seems to have spent at least 10 million on legal fees for the former president.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] StarManta@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

LegalEagle just did a video ranking Trump’s lawyers. Devin put over half of them in F tier.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2023
886 points (96.6% liked)

politics

19246 readers
2827 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS