787
submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

Inside the 'arms race' between YouTube and ad blockers / Against all odds, open source hackers keep outfoxing one of the wealthiest companies.::YouTube's dramatic content gatekeeping decisions of late have a long history behind them, and there's an equally long history of these defenses being bypassed.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TheLobotomist@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

A question for the tech savy, free alternatives to youtube like newpipe relies on youtube servers to access content, right? I mean, if youtube were to disappear magically we wouldn't have a palce where to upload and store so many Gb of videos?

Am I missing something (I know I'm probably missing a lot!)? Thanks in advance for the replies!

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] rayyy@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Youtube is vying X for a internet death while holding the door open for a less greedy rival

[-] aeronmelon@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago

Vimeo: "Today is the day!"

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Banana_man@reddthat.com 12 points 1 year ago

To me it seems weird that YouTuber is doing this at all. They should know that they can't win, I doubt their CEO is that incompetent. Especially after all this time of wasted effort on their side to overpower a very small fraction of users who actually block ads online. Could it be to draw attention from something else that's actually more worrying?

Because as an AdBlock user, since I bothered configuring them and using only ublock I haven't had almost any popups and my experience, especially now on the later stages, is exactly like it was before the ban.

I can't help but think there's more to this because they can't be wasting resources, further damage their reputation and risk absolute monopoly on video platforms for a fruitless endeavor.

Even if YouTube isn't profitable by itself, which, given the user data harvesting and the ads I definitely doubt, google still is. I'd appreciate any takes on this because it's been bugging me for a while now.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 year ago

I would argue it's not "against all odds". The add-on devs probably know better how YouTube is working than the bunch of underpaid, outsourced script writers that are tasked to implement the stuff. The latter also have to make sure that it doesn't break for legitimate viewers (oh, sorry, I meant "impressions").

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Could Google and ad services sue Firefox and extension writers?

I mean, nothing pisses off corporations more than someone coming between them and revenue, and the courts tend to agree.

[-] CriticalMiss@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

No, it is your right to choose what code is executed in your browser and which isn’t. There’s a case to be made about accepting the EULA but if you never registered a Google account, then you never accepted any EULA. This is not the case with modded android/iOS apps as in those cases you are violating DMCA 1201.

[-] ModernRisk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 year ago

Got this too couple of times, all I did was F5 and go on with my day. Nothing happened.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2023
787 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

60090 readers
2874 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS