793
DOJ already has the unblurred tapes. They are blurring faces to hide the Feds.
Wait, so this is actually a good thing? they're just making it sound bad to appease their base?
load more comments
(2 replies)
Taxpayer funded obstruction of justice and whitewashing
Almost positive the government has the tech to see through blurred faces. The alphabet boys will track down everyone they need to regardless.
That would depend in the degree of blur. If it is the average blur you'd have in japanese pornography, then no, that tech does not exist. Super resolution is good, but not that good.
And no, I have not tried.
load more comments
(2 replies)
If they did, it'd be the same as the "enhance" tech from the tv shows.
Blurring causes information loss, the blurrier it is, the more information is lost.
After a certain point, so much is lost that nothing's gonna help you get it back.
It depends on how the blur is done. A lot of the simple blurring teqniques have publicly available tools for reversing. If you need to hide information by blurring, make sure the blur you are using was designed with that in mind (as opposed to being an artsy feature)
load more comments
(1 replies)
ARE YOU FUCKING SHITTING ME
The party of doxxing courtroom staff so that OJ's supporters can murder them wants to protect the identities of insurrectionists.
Sure, sounds legit.
Drain the swamp! Lock 'em up!
That's called evidence tampering!
Nah, the originals are already in the hands of the DOJ, after the CIA, NSA, FBI, and Secret Service got their copies.
They probably saw it live
this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2023
793 points (99.0% liked)
politics
19254 readers
2745 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS