577
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

The former president is still feeding the Christian right’s persecution complex

In recent campaign stops and on social media, Donald Trump has reprised lies aimed at inciting his Christian-right base against Joe Biden. These tirades, centered on the false charge that the Biden administration is persecuting Christians, aren’t just Trump’s typically dubious claims. Much like Trump’s lies about a stolen election, they are designed to immerse his loyalists in a grievance-laden alternative reality in which Trump alone can rescue them from an evil government threatening their freedom.

In a Dec. 19 speech in Iowa, for example, Trump pledged, “As soon as I get back in the Oval Office, I’ll also immediately end the war on Christians. I don’t know if you feel it. You have a war. There’s a war.” Speaking just after the Colorado Supreme Court disqualified him from appearing on the state’s GOP primary ballot, Trump tied this “war” to his own legal woes. “Under crooked Joe Biden, Christians and Americans of faith are being persecuted and government has been weaponized against religion like never before. And also presidents like never before,” he added. “I always say Al Capone was treated better than I was treated.”

Trump has promoted the theme of Christian persecution in the past, but is elevating it again as these legal issues mount. His clear purpose is to deflect attention from his own criminal liabilities by insinuating that the same Biden administration he falsely claims is unfairly targeting him for prosecution is similarly persecuting religious Americans.

(page 2) 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] sucricdrawkcab@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Danger Will Robinson, Danger!!!

[-] Sprokes@jlai.lu 3 points 11 months ago

I am watching All in the family and Archie Bunker's Place and I am seeing the same stories. They are from the 70s and you see that we got years backward.

[-] 22decembre@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

No one misses when McCain was saying of Obama "He is a good guy." ? Couldn't it be good today ?

[-] recapitated@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

NGL, there's a sick part of me that wants to know how this future history goes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 11 months ago

Fucking retards at all of his rallies lapping the slop up.

[-] Something_Complex@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Next thing you know they are on the streets saying Sieg Heil and we are going to be chill about it.

Tbh idk even know if it's true but it seems like something that could happen. Now let's just be sure we aren't overreacting to hipped news.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

They were marching with swastikas over the spring

[-] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago

No fucking way that’ll happen.

[-] Seleni@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Just like no way he’d get elected to office? Been there, heard that argument.

He will get into office again, by hook or by crook.

These loonies will vote for him in a solid bloc happily, because he’s promising them what they’ve always wanted: a chrisofacist state where only the ‘glorious word of the lord’ is law. At this point, with that offer, they’d vote for the Devil himself.

And the rich arseholes backing Trump will do it because their beliefs hold that the Jews all need to be in Israel and then they can kickstart the apocalypse and all get into heaven, and that will be easier to do if they’re in charge of a mindless, dogma-following religious ‘government’.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] set_secret@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Trump's promises are a masterclass in utter fiction, spewed from a brain no larger than a dehydrated peanut. His words are not policies, but a parade of lies clumsily hacked together to fool the gullible and mock things in his way. It's a strategy as simplistic as it is deceitful, AKA basic as all fuck.

[-] rimu@piefed.social -3 points 11 months ago

I'm not too keen on this headline.

Creating a task force to combat non-existent "anti-christian bias" is not the same thing as imposing christian ideology.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

If it acted in good faith yes

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2024
577 points (97.2% liked)

politics

19246 readers
2469 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS