Significance

Climate models show a tight relationship between post-1970s global warming and climate sensitivity. The latest IPCC Assessment Report used observations of the warming rate to constrain Earth’s climate sensitivity and warming projections. However, climate models do not reproduce the observed spatial pattern of warming, introducing a bias in the modeled warming-sensitivity relationship that results in overly-confident constraints. The findings suggest that observed warming over recent decades provides very little information about climate sensitivity, and that constraints on high-sensitivity values must come from other lines of evidence. Additionally, projections of global warming need to account for how the spatial pattern will evolve in the future. Since climate models fail to reproduce recent patterns, this introduces a major uncertainty in climate projections.

Abstract

The observed rate of global warming since the 1970s has been proposed as a strong constraint on equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) and transient climate response (TCR)—key metrics of the global climate response to greenhouse-gas forcing. Using CMIP5/6 models, we show that the inter-model relationship between warming and these climate sensitivity metrics (the basis for the constraint) arises from a similarity in transient and equilibrium warming patterns within the models, producing an effective climate sensitivity (EffCS) governing recent warming that is comparable to the value of ECS governing long-term warming under CO forcing. However, CMIP5/6 historical simulations do not reproduce observed warming patterns. When driven by observed patterns, even high ECS models produce low EffCS values consistent with the observed global warming rate. The inability of CMIP5/6 models to reproduce observed warming patterns thus results in a bias in the modeled relationship between recent global warming and climate sensitivity. Correcting for this bias means that observed warming is consistent with wide ranges of ECS and TCR extending to higher values than previously recognized. These findings are corroborated by energy balance model simulations and coupled model (CESM1-CAM5) simulations that better replicate observed patterns via tropospheric wind nudging or Antarctic meltwater fluxes. Because CMIP5/6 models fail to simulate observed warming patterns, proposed warming-based constraints on ECS, TCR, and projected global warming are biased low. The results reinforce recent findings that the unique pattern of observed warming has slowed global-mean warming over recent decades and that how the pattern will evolve in the future represents a major source of uncertainty in climate projections.