10
submitted 7 months ago by eleitl@lemmy.ml to c/collapse@lemmy.ml
top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 4 points 7 months ago

Less-advanced economies getting a leg up on advanced ones due to a more equitable fossil fuel distribution sounds like a positive thing to me.

[-] Iceblade02@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Modern economies depend squarely on the availability of energy. Removing energy sources without appropriate replacements will strangle everything.

That's not to say that we don't need to phase out fossil fuels (we do).

The greatest irony is perhaps that we instead of replacing our own dirty power plants with clean ones as they age, and funneling extra resources to developing countries to make sure they can start out with clean systems, are rushing to tear down fully functioning machines and simultaneously pushing developing countries into the fossil fuel trap.

this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2024
10 points (77.8% liked)

Collapse

3237 readers
2 users here now

We have moved to https://lemm.ee/c/collapse -- please adjust your subscriptions

This is the place for discussing the potential collapse of modern civilization and the environment.


Collapse, in this context, refers to the significant loss of an established level or complexity towards a much simpler state. It can occur differently within many areas, orderly or chaotically, and be willing or unwilling. It does not necessarily imply human extinction or a singular, global event. Although, the longer the duration, the more it resembles a ‘decline’ instead of collapse.


RULES

1 - Remember the human

2 - Link posts should come from a reputable source

3 - All opinions are allowed but discussion must be in good faith.

4 - No low effort posts.


Related lemmys:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS