80
The news organizations just want the crazy ratings it would generate.
If I were Biden, I wouldn't bother. Biden would be just be screwed over by the useless moderator. Trump would hog the whole debate
Trump is a clown and the media wants to run the circus. The only reason they want Biden there is to play the straight man and add an air of legitimacy to the show.
Biden has previously mopped the floor with Trump in 2 debates and already made Trump look like a coward for skipping a third scheduled debate.
Trump's never had a good debate against a Democrat.
Imagine Trump in a parliamentary system where he would need to spend time in the chamber and actually answer questions.
That’s a losing move for Biden and he knows it. It’s like going to a zoo and a monkey just throwing shit at you for 90 minutes. Trump will just word vomit about nothing and declare himself the winner. Sometime the only winning move in a game is not playing at all. Kind of like nuclear war
Good game Professor Falcon.
How about a nice game of chess?
But the Right has fixated so much about Biden's mental acuity that's simply showing up and making clear points will be a win for him. Meanwhile, I am betting that Trump will descend into the same word salad that he always does (amplified with early dementia), and will look good to nobody except his most ardent Truth Social investors.
So yes, we shouldn't learn anything new vs 4 years ago, but even that situation favors Biden, since he already beat Trump once.
The lines are already drawn and we know what we're voting for with each side, this is just about generating ratings and revenue.
Give the moderator a mute button and I would watch it. It would be neat if they live captioned the bs trump was yelling about while muted.
A very simple response.
"The United States does not negotiate with terrorists."
Why would anyone publicly debate a convicted rapist?
Because ratings
Then he should fight Tyson.
*Civilly liable
I'm old enough to remember when debates were run by the League of Women Voters and had actual moderation and discussion of the issues
It'll happen. Biden wants to prove really badly that he's fit. Trump wants a national audience really badly so he can gaslight and play wounded lamb the entire time. Each side will point to various gaffs the other makes and claim victory.
I think if it doesn't happen, it'll be the first time in my life and I'm getting longer in the tooth.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
"If there is one thing Americans can agree on during this polarized time, it is that the stakes of this election are exceptionally high," the organizations said in the joint statement.
"Amidst that backdrop, there is simply no substitute for the candidates debating with each other, and before the American people, their visions for the future of our nation."
But in a December interview with conservative radio host Hugh Hewitt, Trump suggested he'd be up for 10 debates with Mr. Biden.
He spoke to the crowd from one podium and left the other empty except for a placard reading, "Anytime.
President Biden, when asked on March 8 if he would commit to a debate with Trump, said that "it depends on his behavior."
The president previously addressed a potential debate in early February while visiting Las Vegas.
The original article contains 562 words, the summary contains 135 words. Saved 76%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2024
80 points (85.1% liked)
politics
19246 readers
3308 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS