127

Dan Osborn led a strike at Kellogg’s. Now he’s aiming for a Nebraska Senate seat (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 5 months ago by empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/politics@lemmy.world

3 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] djsoren19@yiffit.net 16 points 5 months ago

If you're one of the many leftists on Lemmy who likes to bitch about how awful the options the DNC gives American voters and you live in Nebraska, seriously consider helping his campaign. Union leaders are exactly the kind of politicians you want fighting for worker protections. Change doesn't happen overnight, it takes small wins like one pro-labor Senator taking the seat from one owned by corporation, and those small wins add up over time.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

It also means he’s experienced in reading legislation, which is the primary function of a Senator, despite what all the politicians seem to think.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 4 points 5 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:

Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Arizona, Georgia and Nevada – these are the swing states most pundits expect will decide the 2024 election.

Three years ago, Dan Osborn led the Nebraska leg of a US-wide strike against cereal giant Kellogg’s as the company pushed for concessions in a new union contract despite posting record profits during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Osborn is running as an independent and says he hasn’t yet decided who will get his vote come November but his pro-labor, pro-choice views are unlikely to sit well with conservative Republicans.

Improving railroad safety is a part of Osborn’s campaign platform, along with cannabis legalization, enacting congressional term limits, lowering tax rates for small business owners and the middle class, and improving pay and support for veterans.

“We’re dealing with people like Deb Fischer who take corporate PAC money and they vote accordingly,” added Osborn.

Osborn is a long shot for Nebraska but he’s hoping that his story will resonate with people who are fed up with business as usual and a 1% that seem to think “let them eat cereal” is an answer to income inequality.

The original article contains 639 words, the summary contains 184 words. Saved 71%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2024

127 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19062 readers

3783 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News