307
submitted 7 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] xantoxis@lemmy.world 129 points 7 months ago

When I read the headline I briefly imagined a world where people who bought new cars were statutorily required to honk at other drivers for their driving.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 37 points 7 months ago

I was SO torn on posting this to the Not The Onion community for that reason. I find the headline hilarious (as evidenced by me commenting "HONK" throughout this comment section)

[-] EvacuateSoul@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

I was picturing the same thing, but I imagined it was automated and I was dying laughing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] fiercekitten@lemm.ee 127 points 7 months ago

What I’m reading is that every car will have to be equipped with functioning GPS that’s going to check against a database of speed limits.

—Speed limits that can change and be out of date. —GPS data that could be stored and extracted from the dealership and sold or given to the government, insurance companies, and law enforcement. —GPS data that could be sent in real time if the car has a cellular connection or hijacks the cellular connection in your phone when you connect it to the car.

This is bad. Really really bad.

[-] elvith@discuss.tchncs.de 49 points 7 months ago

…GPS data that ~~could~~ will be stored and extracted…

GPS data that ~~could~~ will be sent in real time

FTFY!

[-] hikaru755@feddit.de 26 points 7 months ago

I agree with your first point, but the latter two:

—GPS data that could be stored and extracted from the dealership and sold or given to the government, insurance companies, and law enforcement. —GPS data that could be sent in real time if the car has a cellular connection or hijacks the cellular connection in your phone when you connect it to the car.

Why do you think this is more likely to happen with this new regulation, when most modern cars already have a functioning GPS module for navigation and cellular connection for software updates?

[-] fiercekitten@lemm.ee 12 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

It's the standardizing that worries me. When it's required, people probably aren't going to be able to truly turn off their GPS (maybe this is already a thing, I don't know).

Edit: And when it's classified as a safety feature, it will [most likely] be illegal to disable, making car owners criminals if they refuse to be tracked.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world 65 points 7 months ago

There are definitely areas of California where going less than 10 miles over the speed limit will put you well under the flow of traffic in every lane. If you're not going 80 on 80, you're gonna have a bad time.

[-] dudinax@programming.dev 20 points 7 months ago

Nevermind the long stretches in Nevada where the slowest guy pulling a trailer is doing 95.

[-] not_that_guy05@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

Carpool minimum is 85 and everything else 80 minimum.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] tal@lemmy.today 51 points 7 months ago

I don't really care about the honking so much as I do the fact that this mandates that the car track its position.

[-] Dran_Arcana@lemmy.world 33 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

“[an] integrated vehicle system that uses, at minimum, the GPS location of the vehicle compared with a database of posted speed limits, to determine the speed limit, and utilizes a brief, one-time visual and audio signal to alert the driver each time they exceed the speed limit by more than 10 miles per hour.”

Honestly the only part of this that is unreasonable is that it isn't immediately followed with "the database updates will be maintained and provided in an open, unencrypted format for free for the life of the vehicle, and the tracking data cannot be used for any other purpose". GPS is a one-way, triangulation-based signal. It doesn't inherently track or leak anything. I think we would be a lot safer if we all could agree what speed to go.

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 44 points 7 months ago

I think we would all be safer if we recognized individual competence and attention as the key ingredient in safety, and stopped trying to replace human attention with an ever-expanding set of sensors and woefully inadequate algorithms for determining whether the driver is being safe.

Like, if they have to model the driver as someone who’s not paying attention, then the whole design philosophy of the car is fucked, and we’re designing for failure.

[-] fiercekitten@lemm.ee 20 points 7 months ago

I agree. And the whole design philosophy of the car was fucked when manufacturers were allowed to build SUVs and oversized trucks that weigh 2+ tons and don’t require any additional certification or licensure.

[-] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

The statistics around accidents with large vehicles like that are less about their operation and more that they exist at all. Accidents will always happen, certification or no. The issue is someone struck by one will be more likely to sustain heavier or critical injuries, and smaller cars offer less protection for their passengers when hit by heavier vehicles.

So rather than "you can use one of these completely unnecessary vehicles if you pass a test once", they should just be outlawing them all together as basic consumer vehicles. If they aren't being designed for specific utilities or business purposes, you can't make them and sell them to just anyone.

[-] reev@sh.itjust.works 13 points 7 months ago

The whole design philosophy of the car is fucked and we have designed for failure.

"Individual competence" leads to over a million annual road traffic fatalities globally. Every. Year.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

The GPS isn't the issue, the speed limit database is. How does the car know what the limit is, and how does that database get updated when limits are changed or new roads are built? What is the mandate on the updating of that database?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] TenderfootGungi@lemmy.world 48 points 7 months ago

Our GPS often shows the incorrect speed limit.

[-] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 28 points 7 months ago

And map data for speed limits is outdated at best.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mikezane@lemmynsfw.com 43 points 7 months ago

Headline is misleading. This only passed the state Senate. It has not passed the state assembly yet. It also would need to be signed by the governor if it does pass in the assembly.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 18 points 7 months ago

Welcome to lemmy, where every proposal and chamber vote is now law.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] snooggums@midwest.social 40 points 7 months ago

What will it use to determine where you are and what the speed limit is?

Google maps? Apple maps? Is there some government mapping service with speed limits that are updated based on construction?

Can I turn it off when it is constantly wrong on rural roads?

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 32 points 7 months ago
[-] DemSpud@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 7 months ago

I think a lot of modern cars recognise the speed signs with cameras

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 26 points 7 months ago

A lot of rural roads are unmarked, and use the state law standard.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 18 points 7 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Garbanzo@lemmy.world 36 points 7 months ago

Someone driving at an unsafe speed? How about some distractions, that should work out great!

[-] randon31415@lemmy.world 32 points 7 months ago

Beep beep!

Car, I'm on the highway! I know GPS drifted a bit, but I'm not on the residential road next to the highway that has a 25 mph speed limit, I'm on the highway with a speed minimum of 45 mph!

Beep beep!

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] AshMan85@lemmy.world 29 points 7 months ago

It not the job of citizens to enforce the law but I guess cops are too busy murdering citizens.

[-] chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 7 months ago

Wrong type of beeping, though I mistook it for that too. They mean an alert similar to the seat belt or door audible alerts. People who have some sort of device from their insurance ro monitor their driving get some types of beeps like this already (stuff like decelerating to hard).

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] nifty@lemmy.world 28 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Haha this will make using car alerts completely meaningless

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] yol@lemmy.world 25 points 7 months ago

My car beeps at me if j go the wrong way down a 1 way street. Of course it hasn't updated the maps of the area where i live in at least 10 years so it just beeps constantly.

[-] fiercekitten@lemm.ee 9 points 7 months ago

Are you serious?! I would set it on fire and launch it at the manufacturer’s headquarters, then plead “temporary insanity by incessant beeping” to the court.

[-] rayyy@lemmy.world 24 points 7 months ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 19 points 7 months ago

Is this about speeding?

Or is this about getting every car to broadcast it's location data?

[-] UrPartnerInCrime@sh.itjust.works 8 points 7 months ago

Good thought, but that's happening anyway unfortunately

[-] solrize@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago

The car has to track your location and regularly download the local speed limits so it knows when you are speeding? Bet it's uploading your location too. This is way invasive and not just annoying.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago

Mine does this, but it's a user configurable speed limit.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Meuzzin@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago

Enshittification is hitting every part of society...

load more comments (15 replies)
[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago
[-] mlg@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago

The light repeating ding of the AE86 after it screeches around every corner

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 12 points 7 months ago

this is hilarious, and i support this just for the absolute chaos it will create

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 12 points 7 months ago

I'm surprised California dealerships aren't on top of this as a huge threat to their industry. Everyone will want to buy a car out of state.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago

So this turns every car on the road into a speed sensor yes? And then the cops use that aggregate data to feed cops info to inform speed traps and collect ticket quotas

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Literally impossible unless the cars have some kind of tracking software to monitor location.

and you know if its doing that, its not doing it without leaking your data to law enforcement and advertisers.

So, yeah, no thanks. Train cops to do their actual, legitimate jobs instead of letting them waste their time with actual fucking inhuman torture, and the issue would also be solved. and in the right way, instead of the invasive privacy destroying way.

[-] rooster_butt@lemm.ee 8 points 7 months ago

Modern cars read the speed limit signs. Like my 2021 rav4 does it so it's not just the techy cars.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 24 May 2024
307 points (94.8% liked)

News

23644 readers
3700 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS