middlemen driving up prices? in america's healthcare system?? that seems unlikely tbh
Middlemen driving up prices! At this time of year! At this time of day! In this part of the country! Localized entirely within our healthcare system!
Can I see it?
I'll stop posting this when it's not so true for so many.
so who takes over after you die?
By "middlemen" does she mean "the insurance industry"?
The article details issues with pharmaceutical benefit managers, which 2 of the big 3 are owned by insurance companies and the third is owned by CVS
CVS is also selling insurance now btw
That's kind of the only reason ~~middlemen~~ middlepeople exist. To buy things for a lower price, sell those same things at a higher price, and keep the difference.
There is a level of value being added when the middlepeople handle transportation, logistics, ensure availability, etc. It isn't only buying and selling in a vacuum like the stock market.
That said, a lot of them take far more value than they add, which is a problem.
Agreed for most cases. But for the medical industry, pharmacy benefit managers, which are largely owned by the insurance companies, do nothing but drive up the price because they are acting more like a monopsony. So it's a case of the insurance companies often getting paid two (if they own the pharmacy benefit manager) or three times (if they own the clinic) and adding an extra cost each step of the way.
Sorta. As a middleman who works his ass off to make other people's lives easier, it's not quite as black and white. My job is kind of unique, though. We are geographically located in the only access point for a niche market. Our vendors physically cannot supply our customers, so we middle.
I'm sure there are a shitload of useless middlers suckling off the consumer's teat, but sometimes we are necessary.
Shame that they probably can't do anything about it with the Chevron decision.
Don't worry, I was told here on Lemmy after SCOTUS struck down Chevron that putting these sort of things in the hands of the judiciary was a good idea.
I'm curious if the people who insisted that felt the same way after SCOTUS also said that the president can commit crimes?
Imagine thinking that the very same people that don't even need to be qualified as a judge could be qualified to handle any question that involves specific expertise...
Of course those idiots didn't get it, but that decision was 110% a gift to the ownership class... Yet again... This fucking rubber stamp scotus gives Republicans even more power as is intended...
I suppose if we had way more judges who worked on a much quicker timeline and retained independent qualified experts in all these areas, and the judges weren't just partisan hacks, then Chevron being struck down might not be so bad. But that's not the world we live in. Slow decisions by corrupt judges that don't know anything about what they're ruling on. Just look at some of the ridiculous fda related rulings trying to go after abortion.
But that's basically why at the time it was originally ruled on you had liberals upset about Chevron and conservatives happy (basically a more conservative executive and more liberal court at that time).
One slight silver lining is that it may make it easier for judges to strike down Trump admin regulations if he wins the election. But that is kind of cold comfort. Probably have worse issues than that if Trump is re elected.
This has nothing to do with Chevron. The Federal Trade Commission has had clear authority over issues like this for a very long time.
You understand they don't anymore, right? Because of Chevron.
The FTC has statutory authority over the regulation of trade. It doesn't rely on Chevron except in highly specific edge cases and this likely wouldn't be one.
Chevron only ever applied in cases where the law was ambiguous or had gaps. The removal of Chevron didn't suddenly render every Agency under the Executive powerless and if you think it did then you need to go back to wherever Mass Media you got your education from and demand a refund.
Really? You think PBM's are driving up pricing? Genius!
So, we just need to cut out the middlemen.
PBMs have always been a trojan horse
Really? You don't say...
An investigation by The New York Times published last month found that the benefit managers often act in their own interests, at the expense of patients, employers and taxpayers.
So shocked. 🙄 Why it takes so many years for them to notice or do anything.
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.