699
submitted 5 months ago by downpunxx@fedia.io to c/technology@lemmy.world

YouTube has been spotted testing server-side ads, which could pose a problem to ad blockers.

(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] j4k3@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

There is no way for advertisers to know that their ads are actually shown. That is why an ad is a link to the advertiser's website. If there is one thing I have learned from uploading to YT and watching, it's that YT is terrible at transparency and this kind of logistics. I doubt this will work at all.

[-] sirico@feddit.uk 8 points 5 months ago

Arse has fallen out of their money printer so they're getting desperate.

[-] DevCat@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

Yet another reason I'm glad I use youtube-dl.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

~~My local invidious instance is borked too. Not sure if its related and I don't have time to investigate now.~~

~~Guess I need something else for background noise.~~

Edit: Took enough time to get a fresh image and its working again. Looks like I hadn't updated since September.

[-] Siethron@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

God it sure would suck if there were trojan advertisements threatening to take down Youtube servers.

[-] aceshigh@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

Sounds good. It’s a waste of time anyway. Maybe I’ll do something else like go outside or create something of my own.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] illi@lemm.ee 6 points 5 months ago

Since it is server side, will this effect the alternative front ends?

[-] magic_lobster_party@kbin.run 6 points 5 months ago

That’s the point. They want to stop people bypassing ads by using alternative front ends. If they succeed with server side ads, then it’s going to be difficult to block ads. Maybe not impossible, but difficult.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Harrk@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

I got the server-side ads a few weeks ago. Switched to another account and was ad-free again. I'd be happy to pay for Premium as it supports the creators I watch, but for ad-free alone it's not worth the £13/mo. The other features jacking up the price aren't much use to me.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2024
699 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

60248 readers
3328 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS