704
submitted 5 months ago by Stopthatgirl7@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

A manipulated video that mimics the voice of Vice President Kamala Harrissaying things she did not say is raising concerns about the power of artificial intelligence to mislead with Election Day about three months away.

The video gained attention after tech billionaire Elon Musk shared it on his social media platform X on Friday evening without explicitly noting it was originally released as parody.

The video uses many of the same visuals as a real ad that Harris, the likely Democratic president nominee, released last week launching her campaign. But the video swaps out the voice-over audio with another voice that convincingly impersonates Harris.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 8 points 5 months ago

It's a GOOD thing we give this man BILLIONS of YOUR Taxpayer Dollars!

[-] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

I would hope this falls under libel laws and makes Musk culpable for a lawsuit and/or gag order.

[-] thanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.ca 5 points 5 months ago

Any way to see the video without making an X account and scrolling Musk's feed? Two things I'd rather not do.

[-] Stopthatgirl7@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Here’s a direct link to the tweet, but I’m not sure if you can watch the video without an account anymore: https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1816974609637417112?s=46&t=EUtgwMByNj4sQbVP9INV-Q

[-] thanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 months ago

Oh, I actually was able to see it without an account-- Thank you for finding/sharing the link!

It's uh... Pretty much exactly what it sounded like from the article. It's pretty clear to me that it's satire and fake, but I'm not sure that it would be to, say, some of my family members.

[-] pastabatman@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

It's worse than I thought from the article. Outrageously and overtly racist.

[-] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 5 months ago

I’m glad it’s not easy because it shouldn’t be disseminated

[-] thanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 months ago

Gotta hard disagree with you there, friend... Although I see the merit in that, I think we should be taking examples like this and sharing them around with crystal clear context that:

  • This is a troubling blend of real and fake, and it's easy to not notice which parts are which
  • This is a new category of propaganda that we aren't ready for
  • Even though this one is pretty easy to clock as fake satire, it's not hard to imagine nudging a few degrees away from tongue-in-cheek and toward deliberately deceitful, and holy shit is that going to be scary

Like I know lots of people who don't know that this sort of thing is even remotely possible, and would have a hard time understanding how to contextualize it, even if they sense something fishy about it. They need to see and hear these deepfake-adjacent materials first hand with context to innoculate against the truly deceptive stuff that they'll be exposed to.

[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 months ago

It also feels like there's something subliminal about it. Like you're hearing her voice saying she's a deep state puppet then cut to her actually making a mistake in a speech (but it's using old school editing techniques there too) and then back to the deepfake voice back to the actual video of her.

Sure when you see it you know which is her and which is the deepfake. But later if you see some of those actual clips again, you might recall seeing it somewhere before and then vaguely recall some of the things the deepfake voice said along with it.

It's very insidious really. Memories are a weird thing and I don't know if it's been studied what kind of effect this sort of thing could have on people. So I don't know. But it seems plausible that you could create false memories of someone saying something they didn't say by intercutting things they did say with a deep fake of things they didn't say.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago

Even though this one is pretty easy to clock as fake satire

By 30s in to the 1m52s video, when she calls Biden a deep state puppet, is where it’ll be obvious to (I hope) 99% of the population. Prob not quite that high though. But yeah. Wanna emphasize it’s not a deepfake of her supposedly spicy stuff…

It’s what an idiot thinks is cunning satire.

It’s dangerous, of course, but don’t want folks to get the wrong message. We might be at an early stage of Musk testing what he can get away with w/r/t political deepfakes - maybe the next one will be dicier. Or maybe not, he can be awful without faking a thing.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I really do see your point but like deplatforming my instinct is “out of sight out of mind.”

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] p5yk0t1km1r4ge@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Can somebody please just take one for the team and beat the living shit out of this dumbfuck within an inch of his cushy billionaire life so he shuts the hell up?

[-] ThePantser@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

Be the change you want to see in the world

[-] Technotica@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

What is this 2018? That ship has already sailed.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2024
704 points (97.8% liked)

News

23684 readers
4402 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS