1314
submitted 4 months ago by mecfs@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.world
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] cmgvd3lw@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 4 months ago
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] angelmountain@feddit.nl 18 points 4 months ago

I'd pay for a browser if it wouldn't sell my data.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago

Which would ironically give even more monopoly over how the web is viewed to Google. Chrome and Firefox are just about the only two players in that space right now.

[-] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 12 points 4 months ago

No they're not, there's safari and Edge. Don't forget about opera.

:|

Sorry. I'm having a hard time keeping a straight face while I say that....

[-] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago

Opera and Edge are Chromium based. Even most of the alternatives are still Google controlled.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] bruhduh@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] cobysev@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago

Why does this percentage keep going up? Who keeps inflating the numbers? The first time I heard about this, it was like 64%. Then 77%. Now 81%?! Tomorrow, I'm gonna see a meme stating 97% of Mozilla's income is from Google.

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 17 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The actual numbers are $510MM/y from Google out of $593MM/y total revenue. So 86% if my math is correct. It's bonkers how dependent on a single deal they are.

[-] frazorth@feddit.uk 10 points 4 months ago

Are they dependent?

All I see is Google throwing a fuck tonne of money at them, and Mozilla spaffing it on pointless crap. They could probably raise more if Google went away, but they could also reduce spend significantly if they didn't have stupid money get thrown at them.

Its like giving your kids $100 a day. Sure they could blow it on pay to win games, but what would happen if you reduced it to $10 a day? Probably nothing of note, just less spending on crap.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DerpDerpingtonIsHere@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago

Oh no, they will have to stop paying their CEO a ridiculous amount of money. TRAGIC.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] pyre@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

it's not like they used the money to improve the fucking browser anyway

[-] notenoughbutter@lemmy.ml 15 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I wonder if German govt. funds Mozilla
something like the sovereign tech fund for gnome
tax money should improve public infrastructure and Firefox is digitally doing that

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 13 points 4 months ago

I doubt they would make Google stop paying Mozilla. That would make Google more of a monopoly

[-] frezik@midwest.social 12 points 4 months ago

Google pays because Firefox has Google as the default search engine. That deal is where the problem lies.

[-] uis@lemm.ee 12 points 4 months ago

Revenue of Mozilla Corporation. Not Mozilla Foundation.

[-] udon@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago

I sincerely hope that is what's going to happen and Mozilla gets severely fucked over for how they have been running their shit. Break their business and rethink from scratch how we run and finance the development of one of the most important pieces of software around. Hint: You're not going to be competitive with big tech by copying their practices, marketing "AI" bullshit and pocket and all that crap. You can't compete with google there, they can always outspend you.

As a Linux user, such a break would also be very timely, now that we have survived the painful surgeries of systemd and wayland. Those problems are mostly fixed, so we need another dysfunctional troublemaker - Firefox it is!

But seriously: The official story is always that google gives Mozilla the money to be the default search engine. But really, they don't need to care. Google needs Firefox so they can pretend they don't have a browser monopoly. For similar reasons, google used to employed 10000s of people who were doing very much non-essential stuff that is entirely irrelevant for their business. They could have fired them all long ago, and massively increased their profitability. But those would have looked obscene and raises regulators' attention. So just hiring a bunch of expensive engineers who build google chat 23.0 and whatever makes them appear more like a "normal" company.

[-] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 4 months ago

We completely agree, Mozilla should not be run like it is i.e. a Tech Startup and should allow donations to Firefox directly.

It should become a worker owned co-op as that would make a lot of things better in the long run.

It's been clear for a while now, their current way of operating just isn't going to work and hasn't been, especially since they're adding rubbish no-one wants or needs e.g. the private adverts thing.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2024
1314 points (96.2% liked)

memes

10712 readers
1974 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS