-69

Stein leads Harris among Muslim voters in several swing states, new analysis finds (www.wgbh.org)

submitted 1 month ago by UniversalMonk@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

75 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] nexguy@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

https://www.instagram.com/p/C-qXXvet419/?locale=en_US%2Cen_US

Stein agrees with Putin. It suprised me.

Putin believe the U.S. and NATO started this war with their "expansion" and are to blame. Putin wants the U.S. to stop sending weapons to Ukraine to defend themselves. These are also Stein's positions and she has no blame for Putin.

Somehow counties wanting to join NATO for protection against a known aggressor is being aggressive. Swed/Fin did not want to join NATO before the invasion. Putin changed those citizen's minds.

load more comments (36 replies)

[-] Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Supports Russian terrorism and their propaganda justifications for it though so thppt.

spoiler

2. Funding for Ukraine

Do you support continued funding for weapons in Ukraine? What conditions or limits would you place on that funding? Chevron Icon Stein has criticized the money and weapons the United States has sent to Ukraine, and she wrote, "yes, Russia illegally invaded Ukraine – but did so with a gun to its head, or in this case, nuclear-compatible missiles.”

www.washingtonpost.com

She only admits the invasion is illegal because she'd have to be a complete berserker to think others take her seriously otherwise. The rest is one of Putin's many BS excuses.

load more comments (26 replies)

[-] Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win 11 points 1 month ago

Why did you delete and repost this?

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

The news source of this post could not be identified. Please check the source yourself. Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

Ah doing another stein lap?

Let's see, perhaps a "I'm not voting for her I'm just posting articles", with a side of "I'm not doing anything wrong, contact the author if you disagree".

Top it off with a bit of modbait perhaps, as a treat?

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] abff08f4813c@j4vcdedmiokf56h3ho4t62mlku.srv.us 1 points 1 month ago

Well, it's not all of them though, from the article,

According to CAIR’s analysis, Harris leads Stein among Muslim voters in other swing states, including Georgia (43% to 17%), Pennsylvania (37% to 25%), and Nevada (26% to 13%, with Trump at 27%).

load more comments

this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2024

-69 points (8.4% liked)

politics

19082 readers

3710 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News