483
submitted 3 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Democratic vice presidential nominee and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz (D) blasted Republicans’ anti-LGBTQ+ policies — in particular, their **book-banning crusade and vice presidential nominee Sen. J.D. Vance’s (R-OH) recent line about school shootings being a “fact of life” **— during his keynote address at the Human Rights Campaign National Dinner on Saturday night.

Referencing GOP book bans against works like And Tango Makes Three, a children’s book about a penguin chick being raised by two male penguins, Walz said, “This is what these folks are focusing on. Like reading about two male penguins who love each other is somehow going to turn your children gay, and that’s what you should worry about.”

“But here’s what I’ll tell you,” he continued. “It’s a fact of life some people are gay, but you know what’s not a fact of life? That our children get shot dead in schools. That’s not a fact of life.”

top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 155 points 3 months ago

Every time I read about things Walz is saying on the campaign trail, I come away even more impressed and satisfied with Walz as the VP nominee. Dude seriously has his head on straight in a LOT more ways than the vast majority of our political class.

[-] TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee 47 points 3 months ago

They have my vote solely because I want adults in the White House again

[-] blazeknave@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago

Fucking single issue voters with their democracy fetish /s

[-] Pelicanen@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 months ago

Solely? Solely?

[-] snack_pack_rodriguez@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 months ago

Walz and Katie Porter have a good head on their shoulders. It's almost like having a background in Education is a great for representing the American people. Also teachers in general are for the most part great people.

[-] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 69 points 3 months ago

Correct on all accounts! Let's tune now to the Conservative respon- aaaaand they're screeching about brown people eating cats....

[-] Lemonspeed@lemmy.world 38 points 3 months ago

Comment from another thread - “they heard about eating pussy and got confused”

[-] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 months ago

They're jealous lmaooo

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 months ago

"Why would I do something that I don't personally and immediately benefit from?"

[-] papertowels@lemmy.one 4 points 3 months ago

Jesus Christ you're serious.

[-] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 months ago

I wish I wasn't

[-] xc2215x@lemmy.world 48 points 3 months ago

Tim is completely right to say that.

[-] norimee@lemmy.world 44 points 3 months ago

They know that very well. They just want all queer people back in the closet or coversion camps and most important, hating themselves again.

They don't want them proud and out, they want them hidden and afraid.

[-] Plopp@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

So much self hate. It's sad.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 28 points 3 months ago

Walz is on a roll. Saw a speech of his in Pennsylvania and it was definitely a barn burner. But, I guess the media got more clicks from cat eating.

Don't often go and look for others that they can simply Google, but

https://www.youtube.com/live/gG-sWHgYuPg?feature=shared

Take the short cut to 31:20 or so

[-] norimee@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago

Walz is on a roll.

Funny you'd say that. The name Walz has german origins and a Walz(e) in german is this:

A (road/construction) roller.
Let's hope he'll continue to crush his opponents.

[-] Rakudjo@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

RODA ROLLA DA!

[-] MiyamotoKnows@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago

It's beyond insane that the fate of America, and let's be honest the world, rests on one election. It's either 4 years of relative normalcy or hate will reign completely unbridled in the most powerful nation on the planet and our freedom will be a memory. WTF? Get off the couch and vote! No seriously, you must vote. Use your ballot power!

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

I wonder how Walz is going to square his obvious compassion and fairness with Gaza, when that day comes? I haven't heard a word about what he thinks there.

Not that it really matters, as the VP isn't the one making policy. But he doesn't strike me as a guy that just comes to terms with dead children as collateral damage, let alone whatever the fuck it is that Israel is getting away with there.

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 months ago

I would accept if VPWalz is completely mum on Gaza. We know the alternative is worse, and we don't want that single issue to get out there and allow cons to confuse voters.

Even if pressed, I hope he says something generic about caring for people's safety, without saying whom, and deals with it after we still have democracy.

People forget the alternative in this binary choice is super bad on that issue too, and can be easily swayed once it's out there.

Stick to the image for now, keep mum on the topics that'll enrage the belligerent invaders, and see if we can get the borders defined in Palestine's NATO bid. (I expect it will match the border iz had defined decades ago)

[-] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 months ago

I wonder what could have happened if he had announced he is against aid in that short window before the elections, how many power pro-Israeli lobby has to sink a man fast. I imagine, it can be twisted badly to hurt his and dem's chances at winning, and they avoid touching that topic at all for now, with a reasoning that they'd not be able to affect it at all if they lose. That's so if we assume they'd be dare to change the policies after they get there.

[-] nonailsleft@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

I wouldn't suggest anyone to get into politics that can't come to terms with collateral damage

Of course, this was going to clash with his cuddledaddy image sometime

[-] nifty@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Any gay willing to make a throwaway account to answer why they vote Red? The Republicans would make sense if they weren’t hypocrites and actually supported some of the things they claim to, like fiscal responsibility etc.

this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2024
483 points (99.0% liked)

politics

19254 readers
2338 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS