Fighting seems cool in movies.

In real life, it's police, lawyers and prison.

There are few stupider life choices one could make other than fighting in public.

Military, police, security and intelligence operatives train in it for a reason. You're right that it's not very practical or necessary for the average person. And for those who do need it, it's an option of absolute last resort and desperation. Running away, if possible, is the wiser choice. But, it can make the difference in a life or death situation. Someone who knows how to fight and has practice doing it has a big advantage over someone who doesn't.

Exercise: And if you find martial arts fun and a really good workout, more power to you. I think for many people, however, there are less injury-prone ways to get a good workout.

Getting to black sash in northern Shaolin is a personal challenge. It's great excercise, good community, gets me out of the house.

6 years in and 2 forms away from black. I'm almost there

I'm not certain, given your use case. As someone with a deep passion for martial arts (judo > Jiu Jitsu > Aikido > Tai Chi), I would say while they can be useful in certain situations (even tai chi chuan, which is certainly the most inner one). Self defense classes with actual teaching about fighting a guy with a knife/gun would be more suited, maybe.

Not like against a bear, mountain lion, or gorilla no

My two cents having practiced several.

Almost all of them are useful in that they are a form of physical activity. They can keep you in good shape, and can also help you develop discipline.

Many are more art than practical. Arts like krav maga or kali are more geared towards practical use (self defense).

There is also a thing you can generally think of as "energy" that arts may have that often trend to make them not very practical against arts outside of themselves. For example, if a wing chun practitioner attempts to trap with you, and you're a boxer, it just doesn't work. It's somewhat about range, but also the general "feel" of the art as well. JKD attempts to deal with this by teaching different arts that can be used within different ranges.

My one instructor also likened martial arts to technology, saying that they must evolve over time or just end up becoming ineffective for self defense.

The best thing to do in a situation, if you can, is to just escape. Your wallet is not worth your life.

It's pretty useful for looking cool.

I think it has applications, none of them involving a street fight or confrontation. I dodged a fist coming my way from a partner once. Most of the time I use it to take blows properly and redirect aggressive people with whom I work. I want to add with all of my knowledge, almost everything I know would be useless against someone much larger than me.

The board breaking is just a small grift to increase your confidence. When you start out the person holding the board does most of the work to break the board. It's several belts before the board start getting thick enough to put up a fight. All those boards are cut across the grain leaving short fibers that are able to snap.

You are training to dodge and block, Even redirect your opponent and use their actions against them. That's not nothing. A lot of places will tack on a little disarmament and self-defense or run a class with that is the primary goal, But honestly you don't want to use martial arts to try to take on someone with a gun or a knife unless it is absolutely necessary because there's a high chance you're going to get got.

Combat training is extremely useful, even play combat training, It puts you in a situation and has you react a certain way taking out some of the uncertainty and worry out of the situation. You start planning instead of reacting. But for the most part if somebody is threatening you with a gun or a knife you're better off not trying to take it off of them and beat them up.

no, if you want to hurt someone, a gun is better. If you don't want to hurt anyone, running away is better.

It's incredibly useful for fitness and overall health. It's also very useful for self defense. You will get hit way harder in the dojo than you ever will on the street, and learning to take a punch is a big part of fighting. I trained in martial arts for several years when I was younger. One time at a punk concert someone twice my size took a swing at my face, and I slipped the punch and knocked him out before I even realized I was in a fight. The training works. It's also great for self-confidence. Lastly, guns aren't as prevalent as you think they are.

Edit: if you want the training to be more about actual self defense and less about fitness and art, then be sure to pick a style that focuses on combat. Jeet Kun Do, MMA school, Brazilian Jujitsu, Kick Boxing, Western Boxing, and Western Wrestling are all very applicable in real fights. Shotokan Karate is okay in most fights, and better than ground focused styles like BJJ, wrestling, or MMA, against multiple opponents, but less effective against a single opponent. Although, you should really try running first if you have to fight multiple people at once, unless you're a badass through and through. I watched my 2nd degree Shotokan black belt friend knock 3 dudes out once in the span of about 2 seconds, but he has trained since he was like 6 years old and is a multiple time champion fighter. Most people can't do that.

This is a difficult question.

If you're a bouncer, then yeah, mixed martial arts is definitely useful (e..g., something like both muay thai and Brazilian juijitsu). For a typical person that's unlikely to ever need to defend their life, probably not.

As far as which martial art you should take, if you're going to take one... It depends on what you want. If you want a physical activity that doesn't have to be practical, then take up something like kyudo, kenjutsu, or aikido. If you want something that's practical, then look into juijitsu and things based more in grappling. If you seriously worry about getting into a confrontation with someone that's armed, then look up Shiv Works, and see what they have in your area.

A concealed carry permit can be useful, yes, but it's very, very situational, and requires practice. Moreover, ever single bullet you fire outside of a range has to be accounted for.

The groin strike rule was repealed for a time. BJJ still dominated.

I'm not a martial arts person. I couldn't care less. But it's weird how vigorously people will argue against what seems self evident in the closest things we have to a no holds barred setting.

As a rule of thumb 5 years of martial arts is equal to a knief. If the knief user gets 30 minutes of knief fight training that goes up to 10 years. you can train for years on a kneif. if you expect to be in a weabons free fight martial arts are better than nothing but you should be looking to not be in a fight, or if you must get yourself an advantage. If you worry about a gun fight than guns and training to use them is relatively cheap. Or as others say it isn't hard for most people to not get in a fight.

The media plays up gun violence but it isn't that common. You should worry about cars or cancer not guns.