226
submitted 3 days ago by Sunny@slrpnk.net to c/technology@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Blaster_M@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

RIP itch.io

[-] guy@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

Really not looking forward to the idea of github.io links all becoming dead. So many repos with documentation at a github.io URL, with those links spread all across plaintext files and Stack Overflow and forums

[-] 2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de 143 points 3 days ago
[-] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 55 points 3 days ago

while funny, it would cause me so many headaches either directly or indirectly that is completely cancels out

[-] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago

It would cause me a large number of professional headaches but I still think it’ll be funnier than that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ramble81@lemm.ee 35 points 3 days ago

One of our spinoff companies wants to act so badly like a start up and be edgy they moved everything to a .io domain. This would be icing on the cake for how cowboy they manage everything.

[-] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago

Why not just let people have whatever suffix they want?

[-] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

They do, that’s why this is an issue in the first place. The purpose of ccTLDs is to host domains associated with a particular country. If the country stops existing, there’s no reason to use that country’s ccTLD. The problem is they let anyone register domains under this ccTLD even if they have no association with that country, hence the situation we’re in.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 12 hours ago

Actually I believe you had to be a British national to register. Well at least you're supposed to be a British national I'm not sure how much they checked.

[-] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 0 points 12 hours ago

Zero checking. Anyone can register a .io. You can go register one right now in 5 minutes if you wanted.

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Some amount of organization is a good thing for many reasons. Think of an analogy to roads where basic traffic rules allow everyone the freedom to travel wherever and however but subject to the rules of locales. Feel free to pick your own domain within any generally recognized top level domain, according to the rules established by that tld.

In particular, two character top level domains are reserved for ownership by specific countries. They get to say who can have a presence there, under what standards, and they deserve any profit made from that. This was a way of giving everyone a voice, to expand it beyond the us, to give many interests their own home

[-] Fitik@fedia.io 34 points 3 days ago

Considering my instance has .io domain, I hope not

[-] Magister@lemmy.world 50 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Yes, there is laws, IANA says that ideally in 3-5 years all the .io will be gone, like the .yu ones, they do not exist anymore.

[-] jj4211@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

I doubt it. The cited precedent of .yu didn't have a ton of big international commercial interest, but .io does.

They will absolutely find a rationale to change what io means when ISO retires io. The "laws" will be tweaked, ignored, or loopholed around.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 12 hours ago

They're not laws anyway. They are just things that ICANN say. It's very easy to change the rules it's not like they have to be consulted on or anything

[-] coolmojo@lemmy.world 36 points 3 days ago

The .su domain is still active and the Soviet Union does not exist for more than 30 years now.

[-] Magister@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

yes because at the time they didn't know what to do, and gave .su to the .ru guys. For .yu it was also a little bit messy with multiple new countries wanting to control it. This is when IANA made laws to properly handle end of ccTLD like this, .yu does not exist anymore, it will be the same for .io

https://www.iana.org/domains/root/db/su.html

https://www.iana.org/domains/root/db/yu.html

[-] tigerjerusalem@lemmy.world 39 points 3 days ago

Jesus Christ this will be a major pain in the ass if it goes through... I'm really not in the mood of having to reconfigure all my self hosted services to a new domain.

[-] gencha@lemm.ee 50 points 3 days ago

Do it anyway. Having anything behind a TLD that is tied to the political control of a tiny geographic area is insanely careless

[-] tigerjerusalem@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Maybe, but I had no idea this was tied to a country. I thought it was a novelty tld, like xyz and art. You know, like input/output so io.

[-] shadowedcross@sh.itjust.works 24 points 2 days ago

All two letter domains are country-code domains.

[-] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

That assumption is exactly why tons of techbros jumped on it. But no, it's for the British Indian Ocean Territory. Roughly 23 square miles of islands all within pissing distance of each other south of India.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] hamsterkill@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 3 days ago

I'm surprised it's not mentioned in the article, but also complicating this situation is the Chagos refugees seeking to take control of the TLD and/or receive reparations from the current registrar.

[-] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 18 points 3 days ago

Nooo, what will become of my beloved fedia.io?

[-] rolling_resistance@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

TLDR: no

Interesting to see how no one bothered to read the article.

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 12 hours ago

I did read the article. The answer is inconclusive not an definitive no.

According to all the rules it should stop existing, taking common sense into account it'll carry on. Thing is it remains to be seen where the common sense will be taken into account. Common sense isn't all that common.

[-] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago

Real TL;DR: Maybe.

History tells us YES. Money tells us NO.

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The article said companies profit from it, so their prediction is no. It’s just an opinion, and not supported by any legal or diplomatic action in the article.

My opinion is it should cease to exist. Two letter domains are country codes and IANA policy is it should match a list maintained by the UN. IANA has no business deciding for itself and has said it doesn’t want to, and they’re opening themselves to all sorts of liability and complications should they stray from that. If the UN no longer says its a valid country, it needs to no longer be a country code domain, and that’s too bad for any companies speculating on its future

[-] Float@startrek.website 14 points 3 days ago

RIP my @tuta.io email address lmao

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2024
226 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

58645 readers
2736 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS