413

I know the headline sounds funny, but remember that could kill a diabetic.

(page 2) 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 day ago

How does this keep happening? Poor quality control. Pepsi had similar earlier this year.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 0 points 14 hours ago

I thought the main danger to diabetics was not having sugar after taking insulin.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago

Same here. The magic is gone.

[-] Zerlyna@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Good point. Serious oops.

[-] itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

Minute Maid was awesome back in the 80s. Their fruit punch was the goat.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I think they changed the formula of their drinks. I haven't had any in a while, but it was pretty awful when I tried a couple of them a few years ago.

[-] Lookorex@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

Welch's made a fruit punch soda that was next fucking level for me.

[-] EABOD25@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago

Sounds like a class action suit for any person that consumed the drinks while it was advertised as zero sugar

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago

Only if they suffered harm. I'm not sure that enough people will have suffered harm for it to be a class action.

[-] EABOD25@lemm.ee -3 points 1 day ago

Idk man. You can sue for anything anymore

[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

You'd have to prove you drank it before September 10, and it was from those specific batches.

Well, I mean it's not going to kill a diabetic if they consume sugar they weren't anticipating.. sure it might spike their levels higher than anticipated, but it would only cause harm long term if they didn't monitor .

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

if they didn’t monitor

You're talking about a country with a for-profit healthcare system.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TankHiggins1@lemm.ee 0 points 1 day ago

Whew good thing I drink diet Dr Pepper!

[-] Kyle_The_G@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

FYI there is no such thing as truly "zero calorie". Sure, we can't use aspartame and those "0 calorie" sweeteners for energy BUT our gut microbes can metabolize those compounds into products that we can then use for energy. So one way or another you're still taking in calories. Now do you gain more energy from straight sugar vs the sweeteners? I have no idea, I haven't studied this in years. I just like to bring up that little bit of trivia whenever anyone brings up zero calorie drinks in conversation :)

[-] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

That's a hard to believe claim. Do you have a source for it?

[-] Kyle_The_G@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

ya I did a lit review for my thesis a few years back, plenty of papers on microbes metabolizing these compounds, shouldn't be hard to find.

[-] vladmech@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

So no, you don’t have a source

[-] Kyle_The_G@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10144565/ Here's a good start on "NNS"/non nutritional sweeteners.

Honestly its probably not a very big impact, its more of a "its possible" sort of thing.

Its a really interesting field!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] emax_gomax@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

Hah, love this. Never change buddy. You're the best :-).

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2024
413 points (96.0% liked)

News

23143 readers
3886 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS