125
all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 4 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

crazy that the cybertruck is legal in the US while

https://www.roadandtrack.com/reviews/a45752401/toyotas-10000-future-pickup-truck-is-basic-transportation-perfection/

is illegal there.

i don't understand.

[-] riodoro1@lemmy.world 59 points 19 hours ago

If I see one in europe im going to vandalize it.

We didn’t need your f150’s and we don’t need this. If you love american cars so much just fucking move you complex filled husk of a man.

[-] Neon@lemmy.world -3 points 3 hours ago

Wait, what?

Since when is vandalism a good thing?

[-] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 hours ago

Berlin Wall

Confederate Statues

Thatchers Grave

[-] purrtastic@lemmy.nz 19 points 19 hours ago

I haven’t read wired in a few years, and it looks like I haven’t missed anything.

[-] atrielienz@lemmy.world 138 points 1 day ago

So, the EU banned these trucks because they present a danger to pedestrians, and someone modded one with rubberized bumpers to get it registered. That's it. That's the story.

[-] Neon@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

It couldn't be banned because it was never approved in the first place

[-] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 81 points 1 day ago

the EU banned

No. The EU has not done anything regarding this car or this model.

The EU is just having rules that have made the drivers licenses and the registration process comparable and somewhat similar in it's member countries, and to let cars from the other member countries drive on their roads.

The article tells about some of these rules, but it mixes it up with the bedtime stories from this Euro-NCAP guy so that you could get many wrong ideas.

[-] atrielienz@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

EU laws in EU countries prohibit the registering of vehicles that don't meet certain guidelines that would protect pedestrians, yes?

[-] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Not exactly. As the article says, each country has it's own registration laws, and the guidelines from this NGO are usually not a part of the laws.

A country may still have it's own guidelines for the topic.

[-] RunningInRVA@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago

Reading is hard.

[-] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 69 points 1 day ago

There is no overlap in the venn diagram of people who want a Cybertruck and people who consider pedestrian safety when buying a personal vehicle.

Actually, is there anyone that makes vehicle purchasing decisions considering pedestrian safety scores?

[-] Wxfisch@lemmy.world 67 points 1 day ago

No, because no one intends to hit a pedestrian with the car they are buying. That’s why we need to mandate safer vehicles, not trust people to factor that in as they look for a car.

[-] devfuuu@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

You need to meet the right people.

[-] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 17 hours ago

no one intends to hit a pedestrian with the car they are buying

pssh, speak for yourself

[-] Albbi@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago

I say build in spring loaded spikes that impale the driver in the event of a collision with a pedestrian. Since the cyber truck pretty much has that facing the pedestrians, if the driver is faced with the threat as well maybe they'll be more careful with their driving.

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

I’d say auto stop features and multiple camera views on reverse are a good selling point of a car. I certainly regret not getting the overhead camera view on the vehicle I purchased (and the blind spot indicators which don’t apply to pedestrians).

I’d also like to see the infra-red windshield overlays make it out of the prototype stage. This night vision/heat vision feature helps to alert you to deer, dogs, wildlife, and those dumb asses that insist on walking down the road at night in dark clothing in my neighborhood.

[-] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago

auto stop features and multiple camera views

That wasn't meant by "pedestrian safety".

Pedestrian safety is looking at the amount of damage that a car could do to pedestrians in an accident. It comes down to how the car is built. Things like no sharp edges, no hard materials, no dangerous liquids can leak out etc.

It is quite the opposite of what Massa Elon had in mind when he designed that silly truck. And that's why this is a topic at all.

[-] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

Doesn't the existence of this modded truck prove that statement wrong? Because I'm pretty sure you made the only statement explicitly refuted by the existence of this truck.

Congratulations?

[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 1 points 12 hours ago

It's not actually any safer, they taped thin rubber strips over the exposed edges. Someone's friends with an inspector who played dumb, me thinks.

[-] BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com 2 points 20 hours ago

Parents, maybe? They are usually so concerned about children's safety, whether that's their kids or someone else's.

[-] 0x0@programming.dev 4 points 17 hours ago

No, most parents will consider vehicle safety for their kids, airbag effects on toddlers, scoring on side impacts, etc... and don't give two shits about other people's kids.

[-] atempuser23@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago

Article sucks. Buried the lead that so few of these trucks are registered that they are individual exemptions for them. Just like how you can build your own car from the ground up and get it registered.

[-] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Wow. Such a confused writer. Such a terrible post.

[-] Petter1@lemm.ee 1 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

I love the dacia spring mentioned in the article 😍 most price efficient car out there 😁 it is lightweight and max power is just enough 👌🏻

[-] MY_ANUS_IS_BLEEDING@lemm.ee 1 points 7 hours ago

Wow that looks like a generic imitation car from a video game or low budget movie that can't afford to licence real cars.

Also its performance is something else.. Power 45 bhp, top speed 78 mph, max range 140 miles, 0-60 19 seconds. Kudos to Dacia, I didn't know it was even possible to make an electric car that slow.

[-] Petter1@lemm.ee 1 points 5 hours ago

I think 78 mph is about 130 km/h? If so, it is max speed allowed here and I have no money to pay for speeding 🤷🏻 best prevention: having a car not able to speed 😂🫢i lost so much money with my last car..

[-] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 3 points 17 hours ago
[-] Petter1@lemm.ee 2 points 17 hours ago

🤣as if I would care how a car looks 😅 what does it change? You see it from the inside, mostly. And personally I don’t think it is ugly, so your statement is wrong. You may say you think it is ugly which is an opinion that anyone is allowed to have. Saying it is ugly is said as fact, which is not possible for ugly/beautiful, since those can not be scientifically measured.

this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
125 points (87.4% liked)

Technology

58706 readers
4914 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS