217
submitted 10 hours ago by geekwithsoul@lemm.ee to c/politics@lemmy.world

“He’s doing a good job,” Trump saidabout the Israeli leader. “Biden is trying to hold him back, just so you understand, Biden is more superior to the VP. He’s trying to hold him back, and he probably should be doing the opposite, actually. I’m glad that Netanyahu decided to do what he had to do, but it’s moving along pretty good.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Minarble@aussie.zone 21 points 5 hours ago

If you are an American voter and you sit this one out or vote 3rd party and Trump gets in you are directly supporting escalation and taking whatever little restraint away that Netanyahu is feeling from the USA.

Instead of calls for restraint you will have cheerleading from the sidelines.

[-] reddit_sux@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago

People not voting bcoz of Gaza are fools bcoz that genocide will continue immatter of who is in the white house. US support will continue.

Biden's actions have shown there is no restraints, so has Harris's. I am not believing anything Trump is saying.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 16 minutes ago* (last edited 15 minutes ago)

People not voting bcoz [sic] of Gaza are fools bcoz [sic] that genocide will continue immatter [sic] of who is in the white house. US support will continue.

Eh... maybe.

Biden’s actions have shown there is no restraints, so has Harris’s. I am not believing anything Trump is saying.

Fucking what? Why would you not believe Trump when he says that he thinks Biden is too tough on Netanyahu. Please, tell me how you think it would make sense to lie about that. I'm actually kind of curious about the logic here.

You think Trump is lying? You think he believes that Biden hasn't been hard enough on Netanyahu, but he lied about it for... reasons?

What goes on in your head?

[-] Chapelgentry@lemmynsfw.com 39 points 6 hours ago

C'mon enlightened lefties! Come on and tell me how you won't be voting for genocide and we should follow so the Democrats figure out through losing the election that they should court lefties. Nevermind we get 4 years of, "he's doing a good job" as long as Democrats learn to denounce genocide.

C'mon you fucking cowards, get in here and sell me on how Trump winning helps solve your single issue voting on genocide.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 19 points 6 hours ago

I'm voting for Harris. She shouldn't be supporting genocide and neither should you.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] errer@lemmy.world 18 points 6 hours ago

This dumb fuck is gaining in the polls.

I just…can’t anymore

[-] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 19 points 6 hours ago

Keep in mind that the polls right now are also being flooded with right wing aligned groups

https://flood-watch.vercel.app/

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago

Yeah, polls much like any mathematics based discipline are susceptible to garbage in garbage out. You can have the perfect model but if the raw data put into it is shit then all youll get out of it is shit.

[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 14 points 6 hours ago
[-] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 12 points 6 hours ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] nutsack@lemmy.world 21 points 7 hours ago

"He's doing a good job,"

thanks, Hitler

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 11 points 6 hours ago

Trump wants, and largely has, the "Nuke 'em all and let God sort 'em out!" vote.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 13 minutes ago

And yet, if comments on this site are to be believed, he's still also getting the, "We refuse to vote Democrat because we're against the genocide!" crowd (sorry guys, but not voting or voting third party is a vote for Trump. You cannot escape it).

[-] geekwithsoul@lemm.ee 6 points 6 hours ago

True. I think it's more about whether Harris can pull in the "genocide bad" folks, or loses them to third-party protest votes. Of course if any of those folks were paying attention to the crap coming out of Trump's mouth, they'd understand how much worse Trump will be. I had folks (hexbear and .ml of course) on a different post telling me that not only would Harris and Trump be the same on this, but that Harris would actually be worse. And of course they're willfully ignoring how bad Trump would be on everything else.

I have a suspicion that part of what's pushing Harris' campaign strategy right now to focus on courting more "centrists" is that they know whatever she did to appeal to the left that's not voting for her would never be enough to satisfy them. Far easier to court the middle with straightforward messaging than to appeal to a voting bloc that is already determined to hate anyone that's not as chaotic as they are.

load more comments (14 replies)
[-] N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com 66 points 9 hours ago

it’s quite different from Trump’s bombastic rhetoric: He has repeatedly said that Israel has to “finish the job.” The former president’s Friday comments appear to be an attempt to paint Biden, and by extension, Harris, as being less supportive of Israel than him

Trump wants genocide escalated and completed on a faster timetable. If you don’t think that includes the West Bank in the long-term plan, you’re being naive.

Biden is trying to get a ceasefire deal from a madman. Harris needs to win the election and can’t if Israel turns against her. Trump actively wants to commit accelerated genocide on Palestinians.

Anyone who is pro-Palestinian and is thinking about voting for Trump needs to be aware of the long-term consequences.

Anyone who is pro-Palestinian and is thinking about voting for Trump needs to be aware of the long-term consequences.

*Anyone who is pro-Palestine and is thinking about not voting or voting for anyone other than Harris, just to be clear.

The foundational lesson of the trolley problem is not about the effects of the two options, it's that not pulling the lever is a choice too.

Third-party voters, I know the psychological reaction to being told you "have to" vote for Harris causes you to dig in further, to be more contrarian. I know the feeling. So to be clear, you don't have to do anything. But we can't escape the ethical and moral effects of a choice not to mitigate harm. The dominos are lined up, pushing the one that says "Stein" or "No choice" will cause the one that says "Trump" to fall, it's as simple as that. Our moral culpability doesn't end at the ballot box, it ends at the end of rational foreseeability.

The right takes an oversimplified view of reality to avoid confronting complicated truths. Don't be the same by thinking if we ignore a difficult moral choice, it goes away. Trump is telling you what he plans to do. Stopping him is a moral imperative if you want to save as much life as possible.

[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 45 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

From a purely strategic perspective, is this wise of Trump?

My impression is that even many American Jewish people don't like Netanyahu. And he doesn't need to remind anti-Harris protest voters that he's even more anti Palestine. Many MAGA diehards don't even like Netanyahu.

Like... who is he appealing to? Older Republicans, I guess, who remember Israel's early days?

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 46 points 10 hours ago

He's appealing to people that hate Muslims.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 32 points 9 hours ago

And people who think the rapture starts with a holy war in Jerusalem.

[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago

The "left behind" Christians, who want nothing more than Armageddon.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 38 points 10 hours ago
[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Fascist thinks fellow fascist should be free to do genocide faster and harder!

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 19 points 10 hours ago

If he can keep steady poll numbers after an insurrection, my guess is that this won’t impact him at all.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (28 replies)
[-] ceenote@lemmy.world 22 points 9 hours ago

Honestly, is there anyone alive today with more blood on their hands than Benjamin Netanyahu?

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 12 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Trump's response to covid. Putin's entire career. Kim Jong Un's slow starvation of his entire fucking nation. But Netanyahu is up there and we should stop letting him write our foreign policy.

[-] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

don't forget ~~Mao~~ Xi.

sorry, Pooh bear.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago

Yeah, him too. But I'm not gonna minimize the perpetrator of an ongoing genocide either. Netanyahu is a piece of shit and we shouldn't be supporting his genocide. No matter how much centrists want to. We should cease selling him weapons right now. Centrists might not get everything they want for the first time ever, but they can vote blue no matter who.

[-] Stovetop@lemmy.world 27 points 9 hours ago

It's sad to say, but yes. Gaza is a horrific tragedy, but it is an admittedly small corner of the world.

The Palestinian health ministry has reported 40,000+ Palestinian dead. Meanwhile, George W. Bush is responsible for the deaths of over a million Iraqis following his completely unnecessary invasion of Iraq. He's still kicking, probably using some of that blood on his hands for the painting he does now.

Putin is also pulling comparable numbers as Bibi in Ukraine, though that conflict has been going on for a little bit longer than the one in Gaza. But that's also not counting how many of his own men he sent to their deaths, which is estimated to be over 100,000.

Henry Kissinger would also be on this list but thankfully it's been almost a year since his long-awaited demise.

And that's really only looking at conflict. Not factoring in others who are responsible for large-scale humanitarian crises that may end up killing many more people just from disease or starvation.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 6 points 6 hours ago

Not to detract from your point, but the real number of deaths in Gaza is estimated to be between 100-200 thousand.

[-] Stovetop@lemmy.world 2 points 31 minutes ago

Fair, and that's also where things get muddy when trying to factor in the humanitarian crisis aspect into it all. Number of dead due to starvation, lack of medical care, preventable disease, and so on is impossibly hard to get an accurate number of.

I just feel like this is a story we're going to keep hearing over and over, forever. Darfur yesterday, Gaza today, who is tomorrow?

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 7 points 7 hours ago

The Palestinian health ministry has reported 40,000+ Palestinian dead.

That only counts people who get found, obviously it doesn't count the tens of thousands who are dead or dying under the rubbel. The real number is probably an order of magnitude higher.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 19 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

If you're exceptionally fascist, Trump will allot you extra praise. This is earnest as well - it's because he was mentored by a fascist type personality in Roy Cohn - and raised by a ruthless racist Capitalist in the form of his father who refused to rent his properties to black people (putting a 'c' on their applications to indicate they were people of color).

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2024
217 points (97.8% liked)

politics

19062 readers
3838 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS