-4
Minetest-Luanti rejected suggestion (github.com)
submitted 2 months ago by hankskyjames777@thebrainbin.org to c/fediverse@lemmy.ml
7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

They don't want to get the "First Game of the Fediverse" title

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Trent@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 months ago

Or maybe they just think it's a bad idea? Personally, I do too.

[-] hankskyjames777@thebrainbin.org -3 points 2 months ago

Actually not, it allows you to interact from different servers from a single account in one instance

[-] Trent@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 months ago

Actually not what? And yes, I know. Apparently they think that's a bad fit for the thing they're doing. If you disagree, it's open source, fork it and implement it.

[-] csolisr@hub.azkware.net 2 points 2 months ago

Another potential technology they could use would be Matrix, so that servers can send commands to each other in real time. It's better suited for this kind of interactive services than ActivityPub is. Or you could also try XMPP with extensions.

[-] hankskyjames777@thebrainbin.org 2 points 2 months ago

ActivityPub does support extensions (looking at you, ForgeFed, as an example), but you can be right depending on which protocol they could choose

[-] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

think again

what why?

[-] hankskyjames777@thebrainbin.org 2 points 2 months ago

Didn't inted to say that anyway but my changes to thread body couldn't be send to this community's instance

I edited that out

Edit: I was typing that out because someone thought they would develop their games there

this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
-4 points (37.5% liked)

Fediverse

17852 readers
20 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
deadsuperhero@lemmy.ml
wakest@lemmy.ml