687
submitted 2 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Executives of Blue Origin briefly met with Trump within hours after paper spiked endorsement of Harris

The multi-billionaire owner of the Washington Post, Jeff Bezos, continued facing criticism throughout the weekend because executives from his aerospace company met with Donald Trump on the same day the newspaper prevented its editorial team from publishing an endorsement of his opponent in the US presidential election.

Senior news and opinion leaders at the Washington Post flew to Miami in late September 2024 to meet with Bezos, who had reservations about the paper issuing an endorsement in the 5 November election, the New York Times reported.

Amazon and the space exploration company Blue Origin are among Bezos-owned business that still compete for lucrative federal government contracts.

And the Post on Friday announced it would not endorse a candidate in the 5 November election after its editorial board had already drafted its endorsement of Kamala Harris.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Xeroxchasechase@lemmy.world 109 points 2 months ago

"Faced criticism" Yeah! That'll show him!

[-] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 55 points 2 months ago

Maybe he needs to be slammed

[-] Darkard@lemmy.world 26 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I think if he's blasted then maybe he will think twice before doing it again

[-] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 6 points 2 months ago

Blasted into the depths of space, works for me.

[-] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Journalists have ruined this word.

Another pet peeve I have of journalists in general: god-awful referencing. "A report by XYZ organisation shows...."

Gee THANKS, "a report", that'll help me find the source... It's wild there aren't minimum regulations on news referencing in most countries (at least, I'm not aware of any).

Thanks for being my 2¢ receptacle

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] logos@sh.itjust.works 80 points 2 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

“Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power.”

― Benito Mussolini (apocryphal)

[-] zabadoh@ani.social 11 points 2 months ago

I like that quote, because it's so accurate!

[-] diffusive@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

This quote is not true (see this article for further details).

But even if it was it would mean something different. In Italian “corporazioni” are not “corporations” (corporations are “grandi aziende”). Corporazioni are organisations of people doing a specific work. For example masons could have their own Corporazione (they don’t, Mussolini created the “ordini” but mainly for professions so for example even today for being an engineer you must register with the engineers corporazione).

Assuming that quote was true and assuming the translation was somehow literal (hard to say without an original text) it would mean that state and productive sector should collaborate (for the greatness of the nation likely, given his kind of speeches).

Also, Fascism was definitely not capitalism. Mussolini imposed in the board of the directors of every large company one member of the Fascist party. This for controlling their behaviour and making sure that they were aligned with the fascist agenda. Not exactly freedom (it was never their point) but not unchecked power of the corporations either.

[-] casmael@lemm.ee 8 points 2 months ago

This quote is extremely eye opening.

[-] zabadoh@ani.social 55 points 2 months ago

"Democracy dies in cowardice and greed"

[-] casmael@lemm.ee 22 points 2 months ago

^with thunderous applause^

[-] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 54 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

In a way he's doing the country a favor by shining a spotlight on how the power created by wealth can be blatantly abused. This should make us rethink freedom of the press and corporate control of media. News publishing is probably the most important area where antitrust laws should be applied and strengthened. In general, wealthy individuals and corporate boards have gone way past a reasonable point of simply buying controlling interests in something to acquire more power and influence than the public has through government. Democracy means nothing if kings and queens can sprout up inside of it. And that's not "communism" talking, it's commonsense-ism.

[-] teamevil@lemmy.world 39 points 2 months ago

My subscription was cancelled yesterday

[-] punkaccountant@lemm.ee 13 points 2 months ago

Keeping our Amazon prime until it’s 2025 expiration date. Spent today researching alternatives so I can placate my Amazon loving spouse. Fortunately coming armed with info and the promise that they’ll have a several month “get used to it” cooling down period, they took it pretty well. I also reminded them if they MUST get something from Amazon, they still do the free 2 day shipping if u spend over $35. But it’ll probably be easier than they think with all but the oddest of purchases.

Been wanting to get rid of it anyways and this was the nail in the coffin.

[-] teamevil@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

I dumped them last year cuz the products never got delivered on time. I'll never use the site again

[-] Tacos_y_margaritas@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 2 months ago

I was able to get a lot of things through Target, and the rest through individual venders that usually have a lower price than Amazon these days.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago
[-] teamevil@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Blue origin and Trump should both be in deep s*** for negotiating deals they don't have a right to deal

[-] uberdroog@lemmy.world 37 points 2 months ago

Cancel Amazon, shop local, shop direct from the manufacturer

[-] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 2 months ago

I wish it was easier to shop local :/

I'm not even in the middle of nowhere, I'm in a city. But it's so hard to get anything that can't be found at a dollar store.

[-] Elextra@literature.cafe 10 points 2 months ago

I went without Prime for >1 year. I just online shopped directly from manufacturer if I can and paid shipping if free shipping not available. I minimized use of amazon only if I had $35 in my cart for the free shipping.

However, I know I am privileged enough to do so.

I honestly would encourage everyone not to have Prime though. Its like what $150+ now for a year? Save that money and wait until your cart is $35. If you cannot wait, you can pay for shipping (assuming $7) x20+ times before you make up price of that $150 for Prime.

[-] ImADifferentBird@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 months ago

One of the reasons I love my town is there is a great, thriving small business culture. It's relatively easy to shop local for a lot of things.

That said, it can be expensive, and there are certainly things it's not easy to find locally, so sometimes I do, unfortunately, turn to Amazon. But I try to minimize it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 months ago

I haven't used Amazon in over 5 years now. Unless you've got some truly critical equipment that is only available through their platform, then it's just a matter of buying from other sources, or in most cases, not at all.

I just think back to the 90s, where I wasn't able to get literally anything I wanted unless I went to a big city. Somehow I survived. I was ever happy sometimes, if you can believe it :p

[-] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago

I am on the outskirts of nowhere and disabled. All my options are big chains. I wish they weren’t – my small town is now all hair salons, Tai Quan Do studios, pubs, florists, and yard or antique shops. No local shops here carry life supplies (food, toiletries , drinks, medicine) except the gas station (in very small quantities).

[-] cm0002@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

shop local

Be nice if "shopping local" didn't mean 2-6x higher prices, a lot of us can't afford that kinda price hike

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] punkaccountant@lemm.ee 5 points 2 months ago

A family member recommended target circle as a replacement for Amazon prime and I am researching it. It’s still a big company…but where I live there really isn’t TRULY local options (I.E. small businesses) for household goods and such. I figure target is a pretty good alternative and since we have a store pretty close, I can pickup stuff instead of getting so much extra shipping.

[-] Wxfisch@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

So we did exactly this when we dropped our Prime membership a few years ago as part of working against Amazon building a massive warehouse in our fully residential borough (we won if anyone was wondering, they chose not to continue fighting it in court). We shop mostly in store at Target and other brick and mortar stores. We will also shop online still, but almost always directly from the manufacturer. This usually means paying shipping, but I figure our UPS driver and mail person need a paycheck too so we are fine with that. We will occasionally use Amazon for things that are just hard to find elsewhere but only order once our cart is in the free shipping price range. It turns out, Amazon is not only a shit company the uses dark patterns to push a mostly superfluous subscription, most things we buy are cheaper elsewhere. Combined with not buying nearly as much random crap, we have saved a butt load since quitting Amazon.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 36 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

So… the Streisand effect is in full bloom now. They were going to endorse Harris. But they were told they can’t endorse Harris. Now, because of this- more people are aware that they intended to endorse Harris than anyone would have if they had just been allowed to from the beginning.

We all know they endorse her. They’re just not being allowed to actually say it.

Soooooo… TLDR?

The message remains. Despite Bezos being a coward, WaPo still endorses Harris.

[-] mynameisigglepiggle@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The thing is here Bezos isn't afraid of Trump because of retribution.

He is afraid he won't be able to corrupt him if he pisses him off

[-] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

How the fuck is there someone that has to worry about whether they can make Trump more corrupt? Billionaires existing is a sign of a failed society.

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

This is a distinction without a difference

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Wiz@midwest.social 25 points 2 months ago

If true, that might be a campaign finance violation. Any agreement with value to the campaign counts, and must be reported. That's one of the reasons why the Stormy Daniels thing got him in hot water.

[-] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago

So we have a little over a week until the election, and one side committed crimes that will take years to go through the courts, if they even do. Whooptie-fucking-doo.

[-] repungnant_canary@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

In my country for administrative cases with short deadlines courts have fast tracks. So in such a case the court probably wouldn't issue any final judgement but could order everyone involved to stop further committing potentially illegal actions.

[-] bizzle@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

What ended up happening over the Stormy Daniels thing?

[-] Wiz@midwest.social 7 points 2 months ago

He was convicted on dozens of counts, and sentencing will occur in late November. A little treat for Thanksgiving.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prosecution_of_Donald_Trump_in_New_York

[-] chaogomu@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

But that's only if he loses. I have faith that it will happen. But reality doesn't care about my faith. Things will turn out how they turn out and we can only be sure once it's done.

But yeah, if he loses he'll be in prison come Christmas.

That or he'll try to flee the country.

If Trump is near or on his plane come election day, I'll feel a lot more confident in his loss.

[-] mynameisigglepiggle@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

I don't know but Trump is still running for president

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago

The best thing about nepo-bootstrap baby bezos seems to be his wife, who divorced him.

[-] AshMan85@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago

fascists flock together

[-] nul42@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 months ago

Is Bezos more comfortable with the prospect of a fascist regime or an FTC headed by Lina Khan? His recent behavior seems to indicate the former.

[-] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 months ago

Doubt Bezos has done enough to outbribe SpaceX. He should have gone all in on Harriss even if that is somehow a longshot now.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Mediocre_Bard@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

They didn't "not endorse" someone. Silence is complicity.

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 9 points 2 months ago

oh yes, im sure that criticism is just going to rattle him to the bone while he sits on his billions of dollars.

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Bug-eyed villain

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2024
687 points (99.1% liked)

News

23684 readers
3353 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS