677
New Debit Card (sh.itjust.works)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Gyroplast@pawb.social 165 points 1 month ago

"Cash or credit?" "Arch, btw."

[-] ritchie@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Sir, this is a wendy's.

[-] jiberish@lemmy.world 105 points 1 month ago

neofetch is deprecated. There are several alternatives like fastfetch.

[-] timestatic@feddit.org 27 points 1 month ago

For those who got used to type neofetch they probably just put an alias in for fastfetch

[-] Zozano@lemy.lol 33 points 1 month ago

Wait, people type neofetch, as opposed to setting it to run with each time the shell is loaded?

[-] vinyl@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

That shit is so annoying especially when I am just using a small window size.

[-] numanair@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

Yeah, and besides I need to see the latest ad for esm support.

[-] daggermoon@lemmy.world 84 points 1 month ago

I wonder what distro they use

[-] iii@mander.xyz 80 points 1 month ago

Color suggests mint

[-] Engywuck@lemm.ee 48 points 1 month ago

Papara Linux

[-] SeekPie@lemm.ee 34 points 1 month ago

neofetch maybe?

[-] FQQD@lemmy.ohaa.xyz 74 points 1 month ago
[-] PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk 80 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

As entertaining as that is, it does raise the question - why do they put all of the details on the back now?

I thought one of the main reasons that the CVV was on the signature strip was so if a card was photocopied, photographed, or carbon copied (literally on carbon paper), then it was still less possible to clone the card.

Is "physical" cloning so small of a problem now that it's more beneficial to make fancy looking cards? Anyone in the industry able to shine a light?

[-] noredcandy@lemmy.world 53 points 1 month ago

This is an EMVCo chip card, and not an American one so it’s chip and pin most likely. Without getting too detailed, the chip generates a one time use code for each transaction, so just having the number wouldn’t help with cloning the card plus you also would need to know the PIN. Although skimmers still exist and physical card theft is a thing, it’s less common especially in markets that use chip and pin.

[-] PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk 16 points 1 month ago

Absolutely spot on, thank you - always handy to know.

I'm wondering what it does to mitigate the "card not present" fraud though, for online purchases or remote purchases?

[-] iii@mander.xyz 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

In my case, I have to verify online purchases on my bank's app. Which makes online banking impossible without an android or apple phone.

[-] Doxin@pawb.social 4 points 1 month ago

As far as I understand it the pin&chip system involves a challenge/response between the bank and the card. You can't just "clone" the chip, because the secret data it contains is essentially write-only.

[-] PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk 7 points 1 month ago

Sorry, maybe I wasn't clear.

I'm assuming the 16 digit card number, start and expiry dates, and CVV are printed on the reverse - whereas it used to only have the CVV on the reverse and the rest of the details on the front.

What's stopping someone with a picture of the rear of the card visiting an online retailer and going wild with a picture of just one side of the card these days - aside from multi-factor authentication at the point of authorising the payment?

[-] Doxin@pawb.social 5 points 1 month ago

Oh! In that case: absolutely nothing. Credit cards are terrifyingly insecure. Whether or not the info is on two sides or one. Any webshop you use your credit card at can just arbitrarily charge it from then on if they feel like it.

The CVV should really be 2FA from your card issuer.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I just replied this to the parent comment.

Furthermore even if a card is skimmed these days, at least in the UK, it’s still unlikely transactions would be processed online.

That’s because it’s become so commonplace now for transactions to pop-up in the banks app on the owners phone and they must confirm the transaction and / or receive a code via SMS. Some just use SMS as a means to confirm a transaction.

I guess one vector for attack still remains and that is SIM swapping, but even that is more difficult these days due to widespread awareness from carriers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Furthermore even if a card is skimmed these days, at least in the UK, it’s still unlikely transactions would be processed online.

That’s because it’s become so commonplace now for transactions to pop-up in the banks app on the owners phone and they must confirm the transaction and / or receive a code via SMS. Some just use SMS as a means to confirm a transaction.

I guess one vector for attack still remains and that is SIM swapping, but even that is more difficult these days due to widespread awareness from carriers.

[-] r00ty@kbin.life 2 points 1 month ago

I mean, if they knew where you usually shop online, probably not. I generally get the popup when either:

1: Shopping somewhere for the first time
2: Certain businesses (presumably those that are more often targeted for fraud I guess?)

I bet if they tried to use a different delivery address (and the shop passed that on) it should (I think at least) trigger a security check.

In shops especially with contactless it's very unlikely to be stopped though. But I think the bank needs to eat the contactless losses if I remember right. I do recall there's a maximum number of contactless payments you can make in a given time before it forces chip and pin though.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 month ago

It’s literally because vain idiots kept posting pictures of their credit card online and getting defrauded.

[-] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 1 points 1 month ago

It depends. I got a new MasterCard debit card last week, and the numbers are on the front. Only the CVV is on the back.

[-] PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk 3 points 1 month ago

Awesome. I miss the raised numerals on the front of the card.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Vash63@lemmy.world 54 points 1 month ago

Does this get you a discount on Arch Premium?

[-] lars@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 1 month ago

It’s how I got my office an amazing deal on Arch Enterprise

[-] TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml 44 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Never leave the home directory without it!

[-] blibla@slrpnk.net 43 points 1 month ago
[-] hexabs@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago
[-] Matriks404@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

"Hey, wanna check out my credit card?"

[-] TunaCowboy@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

This is what happens when you think manually partitioning disks and chrooting makes you leet.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 month ago

No fun allowed!

[-] freewheel@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Funny thing is, I did neither of those things the last time I had need to install; the script handled it for me.

[-] toothpaste_sandwich@feddit.nl 4 points 1 month ago

Not so glum, chum

[-] r00ty@kbin.life 3 points 1 month ago

When I made a new linux install I chose Arch. I think for me the reasoning is thus. While I have a LOT of experience with unborking server linux installs, with desktop it's just a pain to deal with. I previously used Manjaro which, while very easy to install, does obfuscate a lot of what happens behind the scenes. When it goes wrong, personally I found it harder to fix.

With Arch, beyond enough to give me a terminal and basic gnu tools, I've chosen what I install from then on. I think that means when things go wrong there's a much higher chance I'll know what it is and how to solve it.

Time will tell if this plan works out or not though :P

[-] nfms@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

I've had the same path as you. Arch has been the simplest distro I've tried. And with archinstall it's a breeze.
I've also found that Plasma 6 takes away most of the hassle with setting up a desktop - for my use case.
Been using a PC since Win 3.1 and it's by far the most stable system I've ever had

[-] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

ASCII art is the best art

[-] atheridis@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Σκεφτόμουν ακριβώς το ίδιο.

[-] CriticalMiss@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Wondering if on the receipt it’ll say you’re running Java.

[-] grandpacore@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

This is really lame lol.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2024
677 points (97.1% liked)

linuxmemes

21625 readers
1644 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't fork-bomb your computer.

    founded 2 years ago
    MODERATORS