372
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Vittelius@feddit.org to c/world@lemmy.world

Women “would have their uteruses removed when they turn over 30,” Naoki Hyakuta, leader of the Conservative Party of Japan, said in a stream on his YouTube channel on Friday.

On the channel, he also said that he would make it law for “women who are single after 25 years old not to be allowed to marry.”

(...)

Later, Hyakuta posted an apology on his X account. “I cannot deny that the expressions were too harsh,” he said. “I apologize for those who were offended.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works 174 points 1 month ago

WTF is happening in this world

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 149 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I've been saying it since 2015, but it bears repeating!

The global conservative propaganda machine — lead by the US and Russia — is using all of the data obtained from surveillance capitalism to target, A/B test, and iterate on psychological warfare across social media in real-time (as close to as the platforms allow). The most criminally corrupt and sociopathic benefit the most, as there is no limit to how depraved they will go — bots, lies, disinformation, deep fakes, utilizing actual criminal enterprises and scam operations, illegally obtained data — they will do whatever it takes to succeed.

There really isn't much difference between persuading you to buy a product and persuading you to vote for a political party; they both attack similar weaknesses and vulnerabilities, and the process of building the data pipelines and statistical models is nearly identical. People who knew history were always saying that this is what surveillance capitalism would lead to eventually. I don't think any of us thought it would happen so quickly, but the lack of regulation and highly centralized nature of social media meant that a relatively small operation could access 90% of the Internet using population.

[-] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 49 points 1 month ago

Persuading you to vote for their guy, or if you’re disinclined to do so, persuading you to not vote by instilling disgust/outrage (see also: “Genocide Joe”) or just a blackpilled sense of powerlessness.

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 35 points 1 month ago

Unchecked access to the internet by people who aren't emotionally mature enough to handle it.

Allowing all of humanity onto the internet when 30% of people still believe chocolate milk comes from brown cows was a mistake.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] hydroptic@sopuli.xyz 23 points 1 month ago

Men are going off the deep end

[-] 418_im_a_teapot@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

And many of us men are just as baffled by it. I honestly don’t understand why there are so many men – who I’m sure shutter at any mention of a woman’s period – that feel the need to control every aspect of reproduction and do so in the most cruel ways.

But also, the women who voted in support of those men are exponentially more baffling to me.

My brain hurts trying to understand it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] foggy@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Russian state media just showed nudes of Trump's wife during prime time tv.

We're in a weird spot.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] 332@feddit.nu 107 points 1 month ago

What the fuck is even going on here, this doesn't even align with their own weird agenda? This just seems psychotic for it's own sake.

[-] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 56 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Shock and Awe. He will say some heinous shit in a few days that’s slightly less evil and that will sound reasonable to the rightoids

Basically how Trump speech got normalized in the west.

[-] variants@possumpat.io 17 points 1 month ago

And then slowly go back to the original plan

[-] 418_im_a_teapot@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Is it really any different than forcing a woman to carry and raise her rapist’s child?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 105 points 1 month ago

Just in case anyone is wondering, this is a fringe right-wing party with one seat in Japanese Parliament's lower house.

[-] Gsus4@mander.xyz 52 points 1 month ago

This is how it started in most EU countries: one MP who is an idiot, but gains in representation every election by also taking advantage of the contradictions of governing. These idiots did not use to grow, but now they do...and they are networked too now.

[-] devfuuu@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

From one seat in my country to almost having a full right wing government in the last elections. Yeah, it's not gonna end well for nobody if this shit keeps going up everywhere.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] k0mprssd@lemmy.zip 39 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

good point, but I worry about a loop of the media giving attention, making people more aware that this party exists, ignorant people give them more support, repeat. seems like a similar strategy happened in the us with our media giving trump endless headlines.

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 month ago

this is a fringe right-wing party with one seat in Japanese Parliament's lower house.

One seat too many, if this is the attitude of their leader.

[-] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 month ago

Trump was considered a fringe party to.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 103 points 1 month ago

Smart move for a country with a birth rate going off the cliffs and a terminal case of xenophobism.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 month ago

My assumption is this is to increase the birth rate. The birth rate over 30 is probably lower, and putting a deadline forces you into a FOMO situation. You fear the consequences, so you just get married and have children.

Obviously, this is horrible for human rights (if you consider the rights of women to be human rights, which I at least do). I'm just saying it may be better for births than it appears. It's like video games restricting sale of items can increase sales of them. The human brain is easily manipulated by FOMO, especially with something this severe I'd imagine.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 1 month ago

Yeah, I'm actually hella curious what the context was here. Why would he want any of that?

[-] Shortstack@reddthat.com 87 points 1 month ago

“I apologize for those who were offended.”

‘I’m sorry you’re offended by my abhorrent opinions’

Notice he’s not actually apologizing. At all. He’s just sorry he’s catching flak about it

[-] warbond@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago

I'm sorry you think I need to apologize

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] HerrVorragend@lemmy.world 84 points 1 month ago

Right, so to fight the declining birthrate, they entertain the idea that women over 25 should not be allowed to marry. And on top of that, women over the ripe, old age of 30 get their uteruses removed.

I am sure this totally would serve as an incentive to breed more and not at all make existing problems worse.

What a baka.

[-] Laser@feddit.org 35 points 1 month ago

Right? It doesn't even make sense for their own world view. I kind of suspect a translation mistake, but then again there seems to be no limit to conservative idiocy.

The only way it makes sense is to create an environment where women out of FOMO Mary and give birth early.

Also imagine asking the same thing for men lol these people would lose their mind. But that's just the usual hypocrisy

[-] Im_old@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

They reason (and I want to stress that it's their ideology, not mine) that men can keep doing crotchspawn when they are old. So the obvious solution is to force girls to marry and get breeded by men off all ages. /s but unfortunately not so much

[-] Laser@feddit.org 12 points 1 month ago

men can keep doing crotchspawn when they are old.

But if women can't, why would there be need for sterilization?

I know you're probably right, just trying to point out the absurdity.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] qyron@sopuli.xyz 65 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Because reading those sentences severely reduced my intelect, can please someone explain the brain dead logic of that loon? in very simple terms

What is to gain from sterilizing women? In a severely aged country with low birth rates, as it is?

[-] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 85 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Its a threat to woman that if they don't get married young and have babies, the government will hurt them.

That it. Do what we say or else. The standard conservative line with women.

With trumps win, expect more of this. Being a complete piece of shit clearly works, so this will only escalate. Getting attention, even by being a vile misogynist, is a winning move now.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Bougie_Birdie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 1 month ago

This seems to be about oppressing women while uplifting the creepiest sort of men.

To give the maximum benefit of the doubt (which frankly, I don't think they deserve), there's evidence to suggest that birth defects become more likely as the mother gets older. I've always understood that to happen in women of a more advanced age though, 30 is too young to be a cutoff.

Also, women can't marry older than 25? What kind of bass ackwards handmaid's tale bullshit is that? If you want to have a family I guess you've got to hitch your wagon to any horse you can get your hands on. They're so fortunate though that the law doesn't apply to men, so they'll have plenty of creepy fifty year old dudes to choose from.

I think as a rule we should start sterilizing politicians who endorse sterilization. What's good for the goose is good for the gander, right? Of course, a hysterectomy is quite an invasive procedure compared to a vasectomy, so maybe in the interest of equitability we should begin with castration.

Anyway, this kind of rhetoric isn't really for women - they just happen to be the ones affected by it. For the men that this appeals to, they're probably believe they're more likely to attract a virginal beauty if they start removing women's options. It's truly abhorrent.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Gsus4@mander.xyz 54 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Is it Japan's turn to have a go at surfing the wave of stupid?

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 month ago

Always has been. It’s a country of racist conservatives that continue to deny past genocides. They’re good at cleaning things tho.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] VerticaGG@lemmy.blahaj.zone 50 points 1 month ago

Passing this on:

A uterus is NOT disposable even when you don't want to have kids - it serves a purpose in women's bodily health. If you need to get it removed for health reasons then absolutely do it, but please don't ever think uterus + breasts serve no purpose when you're not having kids. They greatly participate in the hormonal health of the body & brain, in the lymphatic structure, keeping other organs in their place, and it has been now proven by studies that if you do a hysterectomy when young it greatly affects your risk to get alzheimer's/dementia. This is not to say you shouldn't take care of your reproduction or get yourself sterilized if you want. But patriarchy has already commodified every body part of ours; please, let's appreciate our natural bodies and health and not take it for granted. Please do not think your bodyparts are disposable if you are not having kids. That's what men think. Your body parts are valuable and an important part of YOU. They serve YOU and your health, no-one else. You are not a barbie doll that can have parts taken out without consequences. You do not consist of parts, you are a whole person. You are a lovely, important human, and your health and body parts belong to you. I know we are taught to think about ourselves as a collection of body parts and to nit pick them apart, but I want to stress this is a patriarchal way of thinking. Your womb does not suddenly become irrelevant if you're not in relationships with men. It is still hugely important to YOU.💜

So yeah, as usual, why in the world should anyone except the person with the uterus, getting a say in the matter?

[-] Wild_Mastic@lemmy.world 40 points 1 month ago

What in the fuck did I just read

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] fin@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 month ago

Naoki Hyakuta

He’s a notorious piece of crap in Japan.

[-] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 31 points 1 month ago

Women over 30 cant marry? I think this dude is a lolicon. Someone check his pc.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago

Maybe a Japanese politician should be aware of his country's history on the matter before discussing forced sterilization...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MonsterMonster@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

The Japanese branch of the Taliban.

[-] inv3r510n@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

As a single (gay) woman over 30 who’s tired of having a uterus I’m moving to japan lmfao

[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

wow the butchery seems to be going worldwide

[-] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 month ago

Someone got jilted by a 17 year old

[-] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 month ago

I'm going to remove this guy's lungs if he doesn't shut the fuck up

[-] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

And men will have their balls chopped off

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2024
372 points (97.9% liked)

World News

39385 readers
2668 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS