Putin watching Trump follow his hand-delivered list of russian kompromat candidates to a T:
Given how things have been going with the republicans recently, I'm not entirely convinced that "kompromat" would even be garunteed to work on them anymore. If they can seemingly get away without serious consequences for virtually anything, what kind of threat does releasing incriminating information even become?
Yeah it’s less fear of kompromat and more fear of the machine they’ve created that feeds millions of idiots.
Blackmail is the first step, to get them to comply.
Next comes the bribes and money. That's what the Republicans are addicted to and afraid of losing. Russia spends a LOT of money on a LOT of politicians, and they step out of line, the faucet gets turned off.
After the bribes come the subtle threats and constant low-key demonstrations of power. This is where Russia notices someone is toeing the line or stepping out of control and they reign them back in with a well-placed threat delivered in a way even Boebert can understand. This is the "we picked your kids up at school and dropped them off at their grandparents house today" kind of thing.
They're in deep and can't get out without serious harm to themselves and probably their families. I'd feel sorry for them, but they're all a bunch of shithead traitors who did this to themselves, and are now destroying our country.
She isn't compromised, she's an employee.
Looks like fuckin' Voldemort, what shithead
“Al-Qaeda attacked us on 9/11 and must be defeated. Obama won’t bomb them in Syria. Putin did. #neverforget911,” she wrote on Twitter.
Just what the fuck
"Never forget"? Osama bin Laden. Ring a bell? Taliban working with al-Qaeda? The whole basis of the war with Afghanistan?
Meanwhile Trump invites the Taliban to Camp David and not a fucking peep.
We are being governed by absolute brain dead puppets of our worst enemies.
I met her about 9 years ago or so in NYC through a friend of mine over coffee. At the time she was a democrat with strong views about war, given her past experiences that made sense.
Now she is fully unhinged. Sad to see these people who are so willing to change allegiances just to acquire some semblance of power.
Horseshoe theory come to life on that one.
Wow. It’s a long but worthwhile read. She’s a terrible person.
Agreed and agreed. The ISIS fighter jets one got me. That woman is thick as a plank.
One question comes to mind: what kind of qualifications make her being selected for this position.
The only ones so far are her potential tires to Russia. There's literally nothing else.
The only ones so far are her potential tires to Russia.
She's like an all-season radial directly to Moscow.
Is she in alignment with Putin?
Did you read the article?
You're missing the joke. :) There was a typo in the quote and the jokes are now about tires / tyres.
Ahh. Whooshy-whoosh!
What is fox news spouting about her and the other cabinet picks. I probably need to know before Thanksgiving so I'm not blind sided but I hate to actually look.
Most of the nominees are Fox employees, so if you need an answer, it could NFS along the lines of “of course Fox would say that, the hired her”.
No. It's more concerning than those who don't think believe.
To anyone with half a mind that works, every one of the traitor-in-chief elects picks are existential threats.
CIA if you're listening
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News