96
Does anyone actually see much opposition to trump’s will from the spineless republicans? They fell in line completely. The outliers are insignificant. The party will fall in line with whatever that orange asshole wants.
I expect very mild resistance from Congress and SCOTUS. While all of them do have their lips glued to Trumps ass a spineless weasel is always a spineless weasel, if they thought distancing themselves from Trump was the most advantageous move they'd do it. They'll want to build in a tiny bit of plausibility if they want to start saying they did their jobs and didn't just defer to Daddy Trump.
McTurtle has publicly stated that he opposes and will fight against recess appointments. His brain is cooked and he's on his way out so he doesn't have to worry about getting primaried. I hope he's true to his word.
I would be astonished if he is good at his word, but I’m desperate so I’ll go ahead and cross my fingers.
Ha! This is pure propaganda bullshit, they will not stop him, nor do they care. The court already gave trump a license to do whatever he wants. They knew exactly what was coming and they paved the path, then rolled out a red carpet for him.
This is pure shit, so that they can pretend like there was opposition when he does whatever he wants.
Precedent? They don't give a shit about precedent, in 2014 Obama was president. They have no problem flip-flopping depending on whose actions are in question.
I think this will be an area to follow. I've been curious about the conflicts that will arise in Trump's administration. I have a feeling that the Gaetz nomination then withdrawal is a sign of things to come.
If they're too busy fighting each other, that would limit the amount of damage they could do I guess
"When elephants fight, it is the grass that suffers."
It's not a conservative Supreme Court, is a Fascist enabling Trump Supreme Court with no morals.
There will be no conflict here.
Expect a 5-4 majority where John “Susan Collins” Roberts votes against it so he can pretend he cared.
The only policies that SCOTUS will fight him on are when he damages capital interests of their collective sugar daddys', and that is the only scenario they will stand up to him.
but Trump might test limits by forcing a Senate recess using a rarely invoked constitutional provision
I highly doubt Trump can use Section III here. This whole story is predicated on a process that’s a massive maybe.
If Section III was a possibility then it’s likely that the Senate would just suspend confirmation hearings and just floor vote instead. No need for Section III to be invoked.
It just makes no sense to even pitch this idea.
Narrator: it didn't.
this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2024
96 points (98.0% liked)
politics
19244 readers
3180 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS