115

Dear god, no. This is an abjectly terrible idea. Dems aren't going to win until they stop being the other party of billionaires who are centre-right at best yet claiming to be for the working man. Come on, learn something from this election. We want a Sanders or AOC, not this milquetoast rejection of the full scope of the Overton window.

This is going to be a crazy four years, and to suggest we come out on the other side wanting a return to the same bullshit that held wages and lifestyles back for, by then, 50 years, is a failure to read the room. No one wants what the Democratic party currently offers, and I don't see her suddenly becoming progressive. We don't need another president on the cusp of getting Social Security when elected.

We want that for ourselves after paying into the system for so long, but that's not going to happen. Find a new standard-bearer or die. Learn. Adapt. Run on real change, not the incremental shit that was resoundingly rejected and so generously provided us with the shitshow we're about to endure. Voters stay home when you do that, and here we are.

I mean, how many CEOs need to be killed before anyone gets the message that what they're offering has the current panache of liver and onions? Doesn't matter how well it's prepared; the world has moved on, and whoever gets the nomination in '28 needs to as well. Harris is not that candidate.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Brodysseus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 week ago

If we do have a 28 election, surely they'll have a primary and not just run whoever the leadership picks and proceed to campaign on our civic duty to prevent fascism (every 4 years)

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 1 week ago

Yeah, I think they just want to lose at this point. Maybe that was always the point.

[-] DeadWorld@lemm.ee 9 points 1 week ago

I hate the democrats sooooooooo much. They are just gods damn out of touch.

[-] Eryn6844@beehaw.org 8 points 1 week ago

hahahaha! god their even more stupid than I thought. maybe they should go look for other candidates. Seems like half the country doesn't want a women as president. They sure as heck don't want a person of color either.

[-] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 week ago

Gender or race had nothing to do with her losing, she's a right wing POS posing as a progressive

[-] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 7 points 1 week ago

Alternate take: She was told to move to the right by advisors. Politics is nasty business.

[-] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago

Cops are always right wing

[-] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago

and AGs are not cops. Stop repeating the propaganda designed for morons to repeat ad nauseum

[-] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago

She locked up people, she was a fucking cop

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 week ago

Her pattern this campaign was the same as her pattern in the primary, start out as a mainstream progressive talking about changing the system and fighting Republicans, then after getting phone calls from donors and listening to establishment advisors abandon it all for overly restrictive benefit programs and empty words. Almost every time she said something good she'd walk it back over the next week.

This doesn't mean she should try again but finally buck her advisors and be her true self. Her deference to the sensibilities of rich donors is part of who she is.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] chetradley@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago

Nah, the bigot vote isn't nearly as important as the fact that people are sick of establishment politicians. People want change and they see that in Trump but not in Harris.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 6 points 1 week ago

The editor in me has so much to say about that.

[-] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 7 points 1 week ago

I rwad the article and honestly I kinda wish I didn't. This is stupid.

[-] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 8 points 1 week ago

It's not stupid so much as the definition of insanity. But oligarchs gotta oligarch.

.....

Don't.

[-] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

We do not need Sanders or AOC, they are both party sheepdogs whose sole function is to keep disenfranchised voters rounded up in the party with the illusion of they stick around long enough they will have a seat at the table.

[-] Powderhorn@beehaw.org 5 points 1 week ago

Correct. Doesn't mean Sanders was wrong or couldn't have wide appeal. Dude's a fucking independent. So, no financial backing. Follow the money, said everyone, especially W. Mark Felt. He had the opportunity to speak to the working class in the general, and we simply couldn't have that. What was he supposed to do? Run in the GOP primary or be as rich as Perot?

[-] Australis13@fedia.io 4 points 1 week ago

Bold of them to assume they will be allowed to win in 2028.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
115 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10193 readers
9 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS