55
submitted 14 hours ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] spacecadet@lemm.ee 10 points 5 hours ago

I don’t care who it disproportionately helps, this is a major win for society as a whole. Now do student loans next

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

The point is that it addresses a historic inequality. We should care about addressing those

[-] Zedstrian@lemmy.dbzer0.com 75 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

An odd way to state that African Americans have disproportionately high amounts of medical debt; if anything, it's an indicator of unequal access to economic opportunities that let people afford expensive medical treatments.

Therefore, rather than shifting the narrative into one of handouts, a better solution would be to make progress on reducing the country's inflated medical costs—the result of capitalism being applied to the inelastic demand for essential medical services.

[-] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Sorry I'm a conservative so if it helps black people it's the devils work

I wish I could make the /S bigger here

[-] orcrist@lemm.ee 16 points 11 hours ago

What a f****** terrible way to write a headline. But at least the author is honest about their political views.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world -5 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I’m not sure I follow. What are their political views?

Edit: you all assumed this was some right wing rag upset about this but it’s literally a self-described Black news site praising it

[-] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 23 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

The implication is that disproportionately helping black people is somehow problematic. The article itself is actually much more sympathetic. Makes me wonder if it wasn't an editorial decision.

Compare:

How Federal Ruling To Wipe Medical Debt From Credit Reports Helps Address Historic Inequality

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world -1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

The article from a liberal Black news site is racist against Black people?

Do people read article before commenting? It literally goes into the history of racism that caused this.

[-] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 1 points 44 minutes ago* (last edited 43 minutes ago)

Speaking of not reading...

The article itself is actually much more sympathetic.

I literally pointed out that the title is incongruous with the rest of the article. Did you bother reading my whole comment before replying?

[-] baronvonj@lemmy.world 32 points 14 hours ago

Before reading the article I'm guessing they are over-represented in a combination of medical debt and lower credit scores.

[-] irish_link@lemmy.world 11 points 12 hours ago

Even if I were to take the headline at face value. “The other people get more relief than you do!” Okay, I have had shit tons of medical debt. Times I had to make a payment plan. You telling me there is a group defined by race that have it even worse. Well I am shocked to learn that /s.

This doesn’t wipe the debt so no one is in the clear. It just doesn’t hurt your credit so you can actually still apply for the better place or a new home. Chill the f out you asshats.

[-] Phen@lemmy.eco.br 21 points 14 hours ago
[-] miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 14 hours ago

Time to celebrate a first.

[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 14 points 14 hours ago

Conservatives find a way to roll it back, even if it means hurting white people too, in 3...2...1...

this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2025
55 points (83.1% liked)

News

23786 readers
3759 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS