18
This SUV parking (lemmy.world)

Not enough space for a stroller, had to walk in the middle of the street to go around the SUV.

all 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TheDubz87@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

That's not an SUV... But yeah it looks like they backed up ONTO the curb, that's pretty rude...

I mean the truck bed is like 3 feet long, you can't do anything with it, it's never been off-road, and it has two full size rows of seats. It's an SUV in denial.

I call them SUTs if the bed is shorter than the cab.

[-] TheBat@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Emotional support vehicle

[-] twentyfumble@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Ah my bad, in Europe we don't see many of these cars. How would you call it? A truck?

[-] Menachem@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago

of course the one person in europe who owns a pickup would park it on the sidewalk

[-] coyootje@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Speaking as a Dutch person, our infrastructure just isn't made for cars this size. People basically need to enlarge their driveways to park something like this. So if you need to park a car like this it's almost impossible. That would stop most people from getting one, except the type of person that does buy one...

[-] Archer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

You’re not ready for the F-350 with extended bed then

[-] ImHereForVorePorn@yiffit.net 0 points 1 year ago

I mean, US infrastructure isn’t made for these beasts either.

[-] Tankaus@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

I hate to say it, but that looks like a pretty small truck.

Source: I'm Texan but don't hold it against me.

[-] jscummy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Saw another post on here about how ridiculously oversized the Ranger parked next to them was. Had to laugh as an American, can't even imagine how some of the 3500 brodozers you see here would look on a European street

[-] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I'd call it worthless. I could fit more in my prius than the bed of that truck.

[-] theluckyone@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

As the owner of a Subaru Baja, I call it an Ute. The short bed is useful to a point (hauling tanks of flammable fuel, etc) but not perfect.

If it's not a body on frame vehicle, I wouldn't call it a truck.

[-] ephemeral_gibbon@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

Ute is also body on frame (in aus at least) but I would still call the oversized emotional support vehicles trucks instead of utes. That being said, most single cab utes have a bigger bed than a truck like an f150.

[-] penguin@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago

It's a pickup truck. Often drive by assholes who like them but don't need them

[-] Hypersapien@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

That's not an SUV, it's a pickup truck.

[-] Shard@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The parking is almost as infuriating as OPs title.

Bed is shorter than the cab, it's an SUT.

[-] Daeraxa@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

How about a Sporty Lifestyle Utility Truck?

[-] HardlightCereal@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

No, it's a ute

[-] spez_@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Usually I scratch the paint off. Sure it's not acceptable, but fuck cars. I've also smashed the ad signs in Sydney.

[-] James@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago

As shitty as people can be, it’s never appropriate to respond to non-damaging inconvenience with vandalism. That’s you stooping even lower than their level.

[-] msmc101@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago

fuck you lol

[-] Skates@feddit.nl 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Hmm, I wonder:

  • why is inconveniencing one person (admittedly on a worse level) worse than inconveniencing everyone that uses the sidewalk (so smaller level, but wider scale)?
  • why do you believe this? Is it just because the law states one is punished worse than the other?
[-] VediusPollio@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Damaging the car may cost the owner a significant sum to repair. The car blocking the sidewalk is definitely shitty, but mostly amounts to a minor inconvenience.

Maybe just deflate the tires or leave a strongly worded letter on the windshield instead.

[-] TheBat@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Minor inconvenience? Tell that to old people or people with disabilities.

[-] James@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You’re not just inconveniencing them, you’re literally causing hundreds of dollars in damage.

Damaging their car isn’t helping anyone, except for making yourself feel better, it’s such an immature way to respond.

It’s like punching someone for using racial slurs and derogatory terms. You’re not in the right to punch them.

An eye for an eye leaves everyone blind.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip -3 points 1 year ago

If there aren't penelties to being an ass, why would these people ever stop? Clearly this person hasn't learned how to park correctly and not fuck other people over, so until they do they should have consequences. Doing nothing just let's them know they can keep doing this without consequences.

[-] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

See, my crippled ass is going to squeeze through anyway. Even if that means the metal clasps on my shoulder bag grind against the vehicle, or even if the attachment point for the strap on my cane happens to dig in if I happen to stumble because of the tight space.

Will that result in dents and scrapes? Absolutely. Do I care? Absolutely not.

[-] Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago

It sounds like you care a lot.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip -3 points 1 year ago

My non-crippled ass would possibly also have some issues. I might trip with my keys in my hand or something worse. Who's to know what dangers parking like this could pose.

[-] Xeon@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

While trucks are complete nonsense to have for 9/10 owners, sometimes it's choosing between two evils. Either park it like this, or have it stick out this far at the front, blocking traffic flow.

Instead of being infuriated by the way it's parked, we should be just because it's a truck that Is useless to have, especially in the Netherlands.

[-] break1146@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago

Block the flow of traffic. Vehicle traffic has predefined rules to deal with this and it happens all the time. Now you're forcing pedestrians to go onto the road creating a safety hazard. Strollers, like with OP, or disabled people or really you name it are severely disadvantaged by this, just because this person needed a gigantic car thought vehicle traffic was more important than pedestrians.

[-] SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

I haven’t tried it yet, but I’ve heard that you can call to get vehicles towed if they are blocking the sidewalk. I don’t know if that’s in every municipality, but I suspect the tow companies and the city would not mind the revenue.

[-] EatMyDick@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago

Christ, do you really not know what a fucking truck is? 🤦‍♂️

We are truly fucking doomed.

this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2023
18 points (95.0% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35264 readers
468 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS