3
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by chalkman@sh.itjust.works to c/main@sh.itjust.works

The instance seems to be mostly right wing trolls. I know defederating is unpopular but I don't think much is to be lost in this case and it can save the mods some headaches.

Edit: the response on exploding-heads.com to my reporting of transphobia. Courtesy of the "second in command"

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Floon@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I often hear the argument "they'll just go elsewhere," "they'll just start new accounts," etc, to defend not censoring/defederating/blocking/whatever fascist or proto-fascist people or sites. That's not an argument, that's a commitment to rolling over for fascists and intolerance. They're bringing the fight, and not fighting back and making their lives harder is just helping them move the Overton Window further to the right, and making horrific ideas palatable.

[-] BaroqueInMind@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago

To me, Exploding-heads are on the other side of the same coin that Beehaw exists on in regards to fringe exteme ideologies and sensitive emotionally fragile admins. Defederating them both is pretty fucking dumb because it will create echo chambers that will in result churn out more idiots. Just block them via your preferred instance.

[-] eta_aquarid@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

fucking wild to hear Beehaw being of a "fringe extreme ideology" for...

...deciding to defederate with really huge communities with lax registration requirements because they were overworked and didn't have good enough mod tools (because the platform doesn't) to deal with it?

Even saying that they'd consider refederating once those issues were solved?

In what world is this extreme, and in what world is this "the opposite of an instance that is amenable to right-wing people"? Like how could you even logically think that?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] A_A@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

They seem to be 3 or 4 active users, I think I know @Wigglehard@exploding-heads.com if he was on votal. One of the most active at the moment. He is far from a troll. Though he may hurt some people's feelings, he will defend your Liberty of speech.

Now something related : will we ban "fat_people_hate" ? We will ban jokes on any minorities ? Where do we draw the line ?

Something is clear in my mind : we have to band apology of genocide, war, call of violence, and such. We have to ban what would be illegal in many civilized countries

[-] amcjv12@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

These guys fucking suck, no doubt, but I really prefer that we put the impetus on users to block communities they don't like rather than pursue total defederation

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] madception@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Isn't it just better to do it on your own accord?

If you do not wish they mingle with you, block the community you do dislike. You can even block individual person.

If you do not want to participate in theirs, just don't visit them.

Defederating is extreme, it takes liberties and freedom from other users, and should only be used as last resort.

EDIT: @eta_aquarid, why you are discussing this instances meta, you are from kbin.social? And then why you blocking me? Is there some sort of brigade going on here?

EDIT2: So many other unrelated instances' user come in here. Wow. There are some coordinated attacks to make sh.itjust.works worse huh?

KBIN.SOCIAL PEOPLE: This https://kbin.social/m/main@sh.itjust.works/t/39264/Hey-could-we-defederate-with-exploding-heads-com#comments means it is HOSTED on sh.itjust.works instance! It is NOT kbin.social post! Even if you can see from your instance!

[-] damon@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

Wtf, what liberties and freedoms does it take from anyone? No one has the right to anyone’s attention nor any instance. They aren’t being blocked from using the software.

[-] AyyLMAO@exploding-heads.com -1 points 2 years ago

Exploding Heads have between 40-60 active users, you probably noticed two posters you find disagreeable.

Have you considered blocking the users or communities you find offensive?

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

If the platform itself allows these users to participate then the platform is also an issue.

If you hang out with racists and don't argue against them then you're racist too.

[-] Vendetta9076@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 years ago

This is silly. Just block the users/instance yourself.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] nach@bae.st -1 points 2 years ago

@chalkman >hEy cOuLd wE deFedErate wITH exploding-heads.com/

is this the best redditors can come up with????????? :guraKekw:

[-] Barbarian@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

If we're losing our minds over ~20 active users, then we have way bigger problems than that instance.

EDIT: Just to be clear, I have no issues defederating with an instance like that. I just don't think it matters much either way.

load more comments (1 replies)

Fuckers like you are the reasons this is going to fail. Redditor neckbeard hivemind that mass downvotes everything they disagree with.

[-] MachineTeaching@feddit.de 1 points 2 years ago

If you're getting downvoted everywhere you go, maybe your opinions are just shit.

Downvotes from asshole Redditors usually means you're doing something right.

[-] MachineTeaching@feddit.de 0 points 2 years ago

If you step in shit everywhere you go, look under your own shoe.

[-] YellowGas@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Defederation should be the LAST and FINAL option. From what I understand, this is a small instance that isn't causing much trouble outside of their instance. Block them on your own! I'm on lemmy.world, but personally I would like to keep up to date on the shit they post. I don't think we should start going around defederating communities that we disagree with, even though their opinions are shit, vile, offensive, and disgusting. Leave it up and block them on your own.

Edit: 10 years ago I used to be one of those intolerable fucks. Yes - exactly like them. Until I talked to other people on Reddit, real life, and listened to other ideas. I had a change of heart and hope even a couple of them could too. It happens.

[-] JoeKrogan@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yes exactly. Just like there are idiots in real life, we ignore them and move on. Everyone is entitled to an opinion even if we disagree with it. Sure people can spout some nonsense devoid of facts we can down vote if thats the case .

You might disagree with someone on politics but like the same sports team for example. There are humans on either side so like in real life we can get along and don't need to agree on everything.

If something is illegal or its hate speech or something like that then report and block the user and the content.

If you don't like a community you can block it but if we shut off instances all of the time I can guarantee you the fediverse will just turn into isolated echo chambers and we'll all be forced back to corporate walled gardens.

If we can coexist in real life we can coexist here.

We need our views challenged to grow. Being corrected is a good thing thats how we learn. Life is short at the end of the day let's not try to take it too serious.

❤️

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mrmanager@lemmy.today -1 points 2 years ago

We should absolutely not turn to defederation as a first action. You know how traditional social media bans opinions that are not acceptable according to themselves?

We must be better than that. It creates a ridiculous otherwise where people think everyone agrees with them and they are never challanged in how they think about things.

I think we should be exposed to different opinions as long as it's within the rules, meaning people must be polite, not hateful, not breaking the law etc.

[-] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.de -1 points 2 years ago

social media bans opinions

Hate is not an opinion

[-] LufyCZ@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

How is it not? It may be an opinion stemming from a feeling but it's still an opinion isn't it?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)

Listen cupcake, you wanted decentralized freedom. This is what it looks like. People you don't agree with exist. Grow a pair and block them yourself.

[-] eta_aquarid@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

tell me that you're a white middle class guy who's never faced marginization without teling me that you're a white middle class guy who's never faced marginalization

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] demesisx@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

I’m as leftist as they come and I do not support this action. If you don’t want to see it, mute the instance rather than creating an echo chamber.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] rektifier@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 years ago

Let's wait for per-user instance filters to be implemented, then everyone can block instances to taste. As long as their users don't cause trouble in our communities, there's no need for our instance to act as a moral guardians and decide what our users can and cannot see. Defederation is a nuclear option that should only be done if their instance is disrupting our instance's operation (spamming and breaking rules while in our communities).

I like that sh.itjust.works currently federates with almost everyone, and I can see a big part of the fediverse from here. It would suck having to visit multiple instance to see the whole fediverse.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Difficult_Bit_1339@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 years ago

Don't de-federate unless they're allowing the planning of violence, CSAM material, or actual abuse.

As a leftist I see it like this:

Blocking someone is: "I don't want to see this"

De-federating is: "I don't want you to see this"

Blocking someone is: Ignoring a person saying bigoted things.

De-federating is: Jailing a person saying bigoted things.

If you can't handle people saying shit you don't like then you need thicker skin. If you can't engage in a conversation with a person who shares an opinion that you fine distasteful then you need to seek maturity.

If you can't disagree with someone without physically attacking them, then you don't deserve to be part of a community. If you can't exist without abusing another person, then you don't deserve to be part of a community.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2023
3 points (80.0% liked)

sh.itjust.works Main Community

7749 readers
3 users here now

Home of the sh.itjust.works instance.

Matrix

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS