16
submitted 1 year ago by Jpopy@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] burgersc12@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 year ago

Plastic. Its in your blood ffs

[-] keenanpepper@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 year ago

This may be true but I hate the practice of referring to "plastic" as if it's a single substance. It's a bunch of different materials that don't really have that much in common with each other, especially from a health/toxicity standpoint.

For example, people treat it as common sense that "you shouldn't burn plastic" because the smoke is "toxic". For PVC this is totally true, it makes very nasty stuff like dioxin that will poison you. But on the other hand you can burn polyethylene (think milk jug) and it's no more toxic than burning a candle. Definitely way healthier to breath than wood campfire smoke, for example.

There's also such a silly pattern where people learn some chemical might have some effect on the body and suddenly everyone is up in arms about it. For example Bisphenol A in many applications was replaced by the very similar Bisphenol S just so things could be labeled "BPA Free". BPS probably has similar estrogenic effects to BPA.

I'd say the moral of the story is be wary of received wisdom about chemical toxicity from people who aren't chemists.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] lynny@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Social media. It wasn't until very recently that people started to realize just how harmful it actually is.

[-] manitcor@lemmy.intai.tech 3 points 1 year ago

Less social media IMO, more the weaponization of techniques first researched in the 60s-80s made real and pushed via automaton to all corners of the public internet.

The reason you become vulnerable is because you abdicate control (most had no idea) of your feed to providers that own domain names.

This was a co-option of how the internet worked previously.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] HamSwagwich@showeq.com 11 points 1 year ago

Sugar. People don't realize how bad it is for you and how addictive it is.

[-] Zeth0s@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sugar is not bad. Abuse of sugar is bad. Sugar is absolutely fine, as long as one doesn't exceed. Problem is that in American-inspired diets sugar is everywhere at gigantic doses

[-] speaker_hat@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

Do basic groceries abuse sugar? And I'm not talking about the "organic" ones

[-] knobbysideup@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I'd go with high fructose corn syrup

[-] UhBell@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Fructose is typically fine when it's paired with equal amounts of glucose, like in fruit. Your body has a really hard time processing high concentrations of fructose alone, which is how most sugary food is produced now a days since high fructose is a much cheaper method of sweetening food than a balanced mix of sugars.

[-] BaconIsAVeg@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

Micro plastics. We were advertising them in facial scrubs ffs.

[-] PeachMan@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago

This right here. We are undoubtedly the plastic generation. And it's not letting up any time soon; our kids will be included in this cohort as well. Banning plastic bags in cities is next to useless when everything we eat, everything we drink, and everything we buy is wrapped in plastic.

[-] Addfwyn@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

My country is exceptionally bad about this.

Buy a plastic package of crackers? It will be filled with smaller packages of crackers all wrapped in plastic with a plastic freshener pack for each one. I am not exaggerating. I am not sure I have ever bought something that didn't have at least two degrees of plastic wrap.

We did stop giving plastic bags out at cashiers unless requested, but that means shitall when everything you buy is triple-wrapped to begin with.

[-] Tak@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

If it makes you feel better a significant amount of microplastics come from tires wearing away on the road.

[-] Kythtrid@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Another reason to say "Fuck cars!"

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] lagomorphlecture@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Plastic in general, except that we know and just keep doing it. I'm trying to use less plastic if I can but it's frickin everywhere. If you want to buy an ear of corn it's wrapped in plastic as if it isn't already wrapped in nature's protection. Seriously people.

[-] fubo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Perfluoroalkyls aka PFAS appear to screw with all manner of body functions.

Since you mention tobacco: It's worth noting that the smoking/cancer connection was noticed long before peak cigarette smoking in the population. Prior to WWII, lung cancer was considered a rare disease. That changed with the mass marketing of cigarettes.

[-] WagnasT@iusearchlinux.fyi 3 points 1 year ago

There's a couple studies showing that even though your body can't process and remove PFAS and it just keeps accumulating, if you donate blood regularly you reduce the amount in your body by a bit each time. There are other slight health benefits to donating blood and lots of places will pay you for it. So if you can reduce your PFAS intake and donate blood you can slowly get rid of it. I use arch linux btw.

[-] Flashback956@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago

Zembla, a Dutch independent journalism TV program, made a video regarding a big PFAS cover-up in The Netherlands: https://youtu.be/y3kzHc-eV88. If you ask me, PFAS is worse the plastic.

[-] trachemys@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Social media

[-] Mert@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Microplastics and PFAS

No, seriously, these two will kill Earth, and us

[-] czer0_@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Social Media

[-] pH3ra@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Microplastics and plastic related byproducts, like phtalates (which are connected with a decreased fertility in mammals)
I'm positive that the long term effects of these substances, that can be found in every link of the food chain nowadays, will be discussed a lot in the future

[-] Varyk@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Probably brake pads. Everyone's living in cities now, just breathing in brake pad and lead particles.

Oh and car tires. Just huffing those all day.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Tiktok.

You said product, and I mean this legitimately. Not because of meme hate or hating on what is trendy, but because it is and has been a tool of the CCP. This isn't really in question, and it was one of the first large platforms to entirely erase the idea of a timeline and fully devote itself only to a algorithm feed. One that bytedance has put their finger on the scales of many times.

The effect this has is hard to quantify, but the postmortem on it is going to be incredible as we unpack exactly how much this influenced the trends and politics among zoomers, and to what extent.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] Ghostc1212@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Microplastics are the new lead, and screens are the new tobacco, in my opinion. Overuse of sugar in processed foods is the new version of how they'd cut food with inedible stuff like sawdust back in the day.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] jannis@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

PFAS, which are needed to produce teflon and other nonstick materials. It currently begins to attack attention, but wasn't really an issue a few years ago. It doesn't decay naturally so it will be forever in the environment. The EU is even planning to ban all PFAS.

[-] schulzi@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

Some PFAS have already been banned indeed. Unfortunately, it's loke fighting the Hydra - everytime some PFAS gets banned the industry comes up with at least three new ones...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dmahtani@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Social media.

[-] IonAddis@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Vapes.

What will happen is one or another of the flavorings used will be safe to eat because of stomach acid and digestion, but inhaling it into delicate lungs will cause disease long term. Look up popcorn workers lung to see how a common butter flavoring in the past that was meant for eating on popcorn harmed factory workers breathing it in daily.

One of the existing vape flavors... or a new one... will eventually be shown to cause simular lung disease due to daily breathing it in never truly being studied. Someone with a favorite flavor will use it for years, like any smoker with a favorite brand of cigs, then probably get sick from constant long term exposure.

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago
[-] Treczoks@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Social Media

[-] Cybersteel@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Microplastics

[-] mlepnos@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago
[-] sma3in@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago
[-] hahattpro@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

Soft drink. They are just sugar water and color chemistry that give color and flavor.

[-] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 year ago

sugarfree soda represent, aspartame has been repeatedly proven to be safe.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] octet33@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

Fossil fuels.

Things have slowly drifted from "we might wanna consider doing something before this becomes a problem" to "we need an immediate and concrete plan" to "anything short of immediate and drastic action is killing and will continue to kill people" over the course of the last decade or two.

[-] Master@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

There is an ongoing study showing that artificial sweeteners (Aspartamein particular) cause cancer.

All those people trying to stay healthy to drinking diet things... are giving themselves cancer instead.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2023
16 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

43586 readers
1243 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS