151
21
Digital Rights Bytes (EFF) (www.digitalrightsbytes.org)

A FAQ for questions on how your data is used every day.

152
204
submitted 1 month ago by BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

Crossposting here as I consider X a threat to both privacy and freedom

153
215
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

I got this reCaptcha on archive.is and it is too ironic not to share.

154
38

Mathematical prof that surveillance harms x 1K more than it could potentially help.

155
54
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by jjlinux@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

Because of crap like this is why I haven't been on any mainstream social media for 7+ years. And where do companies get off going over employees' personal crap anyway? For the record, I believe EVERYONE hates Mondays.

156
39
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by DreitonLullaby@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

We Need New Troops

You might remember a few months ago I interviewed Phil Zimmermann, the creator of PGP, which became the most widely used email encryption software in the world.

Phil and I spoke about the war against privacy in the early '90s. When Phil published his PGP code as free, open-source software, he wanted to help people protect their privacy. For this, the U.S. government investigated him for three years, claiming he was effectively trafficking munitions.

Phil fought the government alongside a group of hackers and cryptographers known as the Cypherpunks, who stood firm in their belief that privacy is a fundamental human right. Phil laid out this argument in his essay titled Why I Wrote PGP, where he explained that without the ability to communicate privately, democracies slide into autocracies:

“The need for protecting our right to a private conversation has never been stronger. ... Ordinary citizens and grassroots political opposition groups need to protect themselves against these emerging autocracies as best as they can. If an autocracy inherits or builds a pervasive surveillance infrastructure, it becomes nearly impossible for political opposition to organize, as we can see in China. Secure communication is necessary for grassroots political opposition in those societies. …

PGP is good for preserving democracy. If privacy is outlawed, only outlaws will have privacy.”

These early battles, known as the First Crypto Wars (where "crypto" is short for cryptography), were won, and individuals were once again able to exercise their right to privacy in the digital age:

“It has been a long struggle, but we have finally won, at least on the export control front in the US. Now we must continue our efforts to deploy strong crypto, to blunt the effects increasing surveillance efforts on the Internet by various governments. And we still need to entrench our right to use it domestically over the objections of the FBI. PGP empowers people to take their privacy into their own hands. There has been a growing social need for it. That's why I wrote it.”

This essay was written in 1999, and while the battle may have seemed won-and-done at the time, we have since found that it’s ongoing.

Today, there is a massive assault on privacy, with hidden code in our apps tracking our activities, governments skirting checks and balances by purchasing vast amounts of data from brokers, and the normalization of surveillance creating a dangerous complacency around the loss of privacy.

Phil Zimmermann has since realized:

“We are going to need fresh troops.”

Learning From Battles of the Past

We won’t win unless we inspire others to join our cause. During the First Crypto Wars, people were galvanized by rallying cries from pioneers like Phil Zimmermann and manifestos written by Cypherpunks like Tim May and Eric Hughes.

I can’t possibly expect to reach their standards, but I have tried my hand at writing a manifesto. My hope is that it might contribute, in some small way, to encouraging people to join us.

I have also soft-launched a new institute—a nonprofit dedicated to helping people maintain their freedom and dignity in the digital age. I haven’t officially announced it yet (you’ll hear more in the coming months), but our board of advisors is packed with inspiring Cypherpunks who fought these early privacy battles, including Phil Zimmermann himself.

This manifesto may seem intense in a world where surveillance has become normalized. But we need to shift the Overton Window back to a place where individuals are empowered in their own lives. As Phil said in his essay, “There’s nothing wrong with asserting your privacy.”

Here it is. Tell me what you think.

The Priv/Acc Manifesto

A new force is rising in the digital age, a force to reclaim what has been quietly stolen: privacy.

We are the Privacy Accelerationists—driven by a simple conviction that privacy is not optional, but essential for personal freedom. Surveillance capitalism, government overreach, and the culture of data extraction corrode our ability to live freely, think independently, and interact with trust.

The future of privacy is no longer something that can be delayed, debated, or dissected. It must be accelerated—now. The pace of intrusion is relentless; our response must be swifter still. The tools to protect privacy—encryption, decentralized networks, and privacy-enhancing technologies—already exist. But only decisive action can ensure these tools are put into the hands of billions.

We are not radicals for desiring privacy, but because we understand that privacy is power—liberation in a world that seeks to control us. Privacy is rebellion. In a society where thoughts, desires, and behaviors are commodified for control, privacy becomes the means by which we reclaim our lives and identities.

The systems of surveillance—corporate, governmental, and societal—are intertwined, feeding off each other in a symbiotic cycle. But as history shows, even the most entrenched systems are vulnerable to revolution. Cryptography is that revolution. Anonymous transactions, encrypted communications, decentralized data: these are not just theoretical tools but the foundations of a new era.

Governments and corporations will attempt to stop us, justifying endless data collection with claims of “efficiency” or “security.” They will argue privacy is unnecessary in a world where transparency is a virtue. They will say, "If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear."

We reject these premises entirely. Privacy is not about hiding—it’s about choice. The choice of what to reveal, to whom, and when. Without privacy, there is no autonomy; without autonomy, there is no freedom. The acceleration of privacy technology is our only path forward. We do not oppose technology—we champion it. Our fight is against the hijacking of technology to strip away privacy and autonomy. We assert our right to navigate the digital world without the oppressive gaze of surveillance. By embracing technology as a tool for empowerment, we can restore control over personal information to where it belongs—with the individual. This is our moral imperative, our stand for a future where freedom and technology coexist.

The systems of control thrive on complacency and apathy. We are here to disrupt that cycle. We will accelerate the adoption of privacy-enhancing technologies—not as a slow reform, but as a revolution. Code is our weapon, and knowledge our shield. We build not for governments or corporations, but for people.

Privacy is the cornerstone of an open society in the digital age. To build that society, we will work with cryptographers, developers, activists, and everyday users. We will create networks that resist censorship, tools that ensure anonymity, and communities that defend privacy at all costs.

We will not wait for permission. We will not apologize for defending our right to exist unobserved. We are not products. We are not data points. We are free individuals.

Join us, or stand aside. Privacy will not wait.

Onward.

Privacc.org

157
476
submitted 1 month ago by DollarColonial@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

Post got deleted, posts removed...

158
270
submitted 1 month ago by szemy@lemmy.one to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/33165280

I got a copy of the text from the email, and added it below, with personal information and link trackers removed.

Hello [receiver's name],

I’ve long dreamed about working for Mozilla. I learned how to send encrypted e-mail using Mozilla Thunderbird, and I’ve been a Firefox user since almost as long as I can remember. In more recent years, I’ve been an avid follower of Mozilla’s advocacy work, and was lucky enough to partner with Mozilla on investigative journalism in my last job.

In many ways, Mozilla was the dream – and now, as the leader of the Foundation, my job is to make my dreams for Mozilla come true. What that means, though, is making your dreams come true – for a trustworthy and open future of technology; for tech that is a tool for liberation, not limitation; and for tech that values people over profit.

So I’m reaching out to technologists, activists, researchers, engineers, policy experts, and, most importantly, to you – the people who make up the Mozilla community – to ask a simple question.

[receiver's name]. What is your dream for Mozilla? I invite you to take a moment to share your thoughts by completing this brief survey.

Let’s start with this question:

Question 1: What is most important to you right now about technology and the internet?

  • Protecting my privacy online
  • Avoiding scams
  • Choosing products, apps, technology, and services that I can trust
  • Keeping children safe online
  • Responsible use of AI
  • Keeping the internet is open and free
  • Knowing how to spot misinformation
  • Other (please specify)

Take the survey now →

With your help, together we can imagine and create the Internet we want. Thank you for being a part of this.

Always yours,

Nabiha Syed Executive Director Mozilla Foundation

159
64
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by lemmus@szmer.info to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

TLDR: i complain about samsung's flagship and newer android.

I use samsung flagship phone and it's crazy, how unable I am to use full potential of my phone, just because I don't want to log in to google neither to samsung. I try to use F-droid and Aurora Store whenever possible, but its so bad experience...for maps I use Organic Maps, but google forces it to be installed specifically from Google Play Store to work with Android Auto, so I have to log in every time there is an update. Most of games won't work, because they require being signed-in to google, and thats actually kinda weird..before my phone now I had an old Galaxy S5 Android 6.0 and games there didn't complain that much as here on Android 14 (so the newer android the less privacy you get, while them all companies "focus on privacy", bullshit liars), samsung requires signing-in to usd like 1/10 of the flagship features..It's so sad, as I love samsung's quality, phone is really outstanding, overall all samsung products are very good quality, but pushing these fucking accounts is convincing me not to buy samsung's flagship anymore. We need to finally unite and make some alternative to those close-sourced bloatware, as phone industry is nowhere near to being as free as desktop industry. I feel more free using Windoze than those fucking " smart"phones. Really if you have to buy new smartphone and are into privacy, think twice before you buy samsung..phone itself is great, but software side is a nightmare.

160
138
submitted 1 month ago by annHowe@lemmy.zip to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
161
62
submitted 1 month ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
162
50
submitted 1 month ago by ZeDoTelhado@lemmy.world to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

I have now a pixel 8, which was working OK from the past 8 months and using grapheneos. Unfortunately, today out of nowhere got the green screen bug (searched around, this seems to be really a thing with pixel 8 and some pixel 7). This really stroke me a nerve. Previously I had a pixel 5 which at some point also got screen problems and later the speaker piece just straight up did not work properly. And now this with the pixel 8.

So my question is: what other phones could potentially be used with a custom ROM that allow bootloader relocking? Other Roms can be something like divest or calyx (I used calyx before, so I am fairly familiar with it).

It really pisses me off the only option until now are pixel phones for proper relocking (from what I know from a while back), and then they have these annoying issues. It makes my skin crawl, but if required I would change to an iPhone (and throwaway a lot of things that android is actually superior, such as proper tor browser, VPN split tunneling, work/user profiles, no bloody account to use a phone).

Thanks for the responses in advance.

163
17
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Nicro@discuss.tchncs.de to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

Hey there,

Due to having an unlocked bootloader, I fail safetynet. So Google-Pay is locked out, even if I wanted to use it. I find cash or cards to inconvenient, since my dexterity is impaired.

So I looked into getting an nfc-token to pay with and found that my bank is partnered with Fidesmo. This would allow for mobile-pay without an extra party involved. They seem fine from what I found online and they do publish some client-code on Github, but I had never heard of them.

Does anyone have any info on them?

164
76
submitted 1 month ago by bpt11@sh.itjust.works to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

I used google for most of my life, for the past couple months I’ve been using brave search, but I still end up using google often because google images is far better than brave search images. I’m also worried that maybe brave search isn’t the best choice. What would you guys recommend?

165
37
submitted 1 month ago by Binzy_Boi@feddit.online to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

Hi all,

I'm currently wanting to make a few wiki pages for a community I host here on PieFed. Not trying to advertise the community, but for context, it's a community about BY-NC-SA licensed music, and I'm wanting to create a guide as to how to find new music with that license on certain platforms.

My trouble is this. I want to provide those viewing posts with the ability to find music with ease utilizing search engines when that's the best option to do so. However, I also don't want to have that search engine be Google if that's at all possible.

The main features I'm needing are to only fetch results from certain websites, and to specifically include or exclude specific phrases. For example, if I wanted to find BY-NC-SA power metal music on BandCamp, and exclude songs from the band Blind Desire for some random reason, I'd have the following search:

In this case, Google only fetches results from bandcamp.com, only with the BY-NC-SA license, and only with the words "power metal" in the page, while also removing results from Blind Desire.

Are there any privacy-friendly options that have similar search features? Being made aware of an alternative like this will definitely help me kick what little reliance I have left on Google.

Thanks in advance.

166
89
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Scolding7300@lemmy.world to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

TL;DW

LINDDUN card deck PDF for reference: https://downloads.linddun.org/linddun-go/default/v240118/go.pdf

167
368
submitted 1 month ago by mox@lemmy.sdf.org to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
168
33

On Android/GrapheneOS, Firefox/Mull/variants is the only browser with the needed proxy settings to use with i2p.

After a bit of searching, it works very well!

As i2p servers you can use "i2p", "i2pd" (more minimal but more efficient) or "InviziblePro" which bundles some implementation of i2p.

I am using i2pd currently, and it works well.

Installed the apps with Obtainium

  • Mull from the DivestOS F-Droid repo
  • i2pd from the purplei2p F-Droid repo
  • MullvadVPN from Github, Orbot from the guardianproject repo (as fallback if clearnet sites are used)

The browser can open .i2p and clearnet sites, using a little hack:

network.proxy.no_proxies_on to !.i2p

169
230
170
275
171
43

I was wondering, which country's exit nodes (VPN) do you use and why? Are some countries better than others (in terms of jurisdiction and laws, not latency)?

172
8

I've been reading upon improve security and privacy. I was wondering how many mail addresses you should have. Is it one per social media, one for everything finance, ... Next to this, are the mail addresses you use aliases or actual mail addresses and do you create them on outlook, proton or self host the mail server?

173
14
submitted 1 month ago by OminousOrange@lemmy.ca to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
174
94

I use MullvadVPN, GrapheneOS and Linux but I also search for any more apps not like OSes. What'a your favorites?

175
17
submitted 1 month ago by ComradeMiao@lemmy.world to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

What's going on with that?

view more: ‹ prev next ›

Privacy

32631 readers
448 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS