127

You'll probably find that a lot of planets in Starfield are pretty boring, but Bethesda says that's kind of the point.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Renacles@discuss.tchncs.de 30 points 1 year ago

A lot of people seem to want this game to do poorly, half the comments complaining about it also say that they haven't played it yet.

[-] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 18 points 1 year ago

Honestly, avoid Lemmy and Reddit for reviews on this game. The absolute vitriol it's gotten here has just pushed me beyond trusting any of them. (and yes, they all end with "I mean I haven't played it.")

I have played it. 8 hours in so far, it's fun. I won't say it's "redefining RPGs" for me or anything, but I'm having a good time playing around. To others here on Lemmy I am now the worst person on the planet.

[-] 10982302@artemis.camp 8 points 1 year ago

Also avoid the Steam discussion forum. Awful awful place right now.

[-] Erk@cdda.social 5 points 1 year ago

Have you ever seen a steam discussion forum that isn't?

[-] bermuda@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Steam off topic pre-2013 was a gold mine.

[-] Renacles@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 year ago

It's the same people that have been bashing Bethesda for years now, they don't care whether the game is actually good or not, they just want to bash the people behind it.

I'll play it for myself on gamepass and see what I think, discussion around it has been worthless here.

[-] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 10 points 1 year ago

"all these planet are boring"

Yeah, as if Mars and Pluto is interesting. People want this game to fail because it isn't a better game than the darling Baldur's Gate 3. And gamer has been like this for a while: either the game is 10/10 or it's shit/10, there's no between.

I remember the time when zelda botw came out and jim sterling gave it a 7/10,people went banana over that lol. Starfield and Witcher 3 may very well be a 6 or 7/10 game, and that's okay.

[-] Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 year ago

The point of a game is to be fun in some sense of the word, not to depict Mars as scientificly accurate as possible, unless it's Scientificly Accurate Mars Simulator.
If the planneta are boring, then the game about exploring those planets are probably failed at being fun, and that's kind of irregardless of what people want.
Personally I would like all the games to be good, for example.

[-] Chobbes@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

I dunno, I don’t think the point of all art is to be “fun”. There’s plenty of examples of games that aren’t necessarily fun but do something interesting in some sense or inspire other emotions. Exploring a bunch of dead and boring planets may not be fun and maybe it’s not compelling or worth doing in Starfield, but I think it can be interesting to have something more “boring” most of the time to have other moments stand out… and sometimes something being boring or painful is part of the experience and it wouldn’t be as worthwhile without, like for example particularly difficult games can be pretty painful to play through, but sometimes having gone through the painful thing is a huge part of why you care about the experience.

Of course not everything is for everybody, and more “boring” experiences in general are probably not what the average person playing video games is into… but there’s plenty of us who like a good boring or tedious or painful slog every once in a while :). Maybe it’s rewarding, maybe it sets the atmosphere, maybe it’s meaningful in some other way… I get it, but I think it’s a little sad to reduce games to “just supposed to be fun!” It’s an awesome art form and I love seeing other creative things done with it.

[-] Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago

By fun I largely mean "brings positive and meaningful experience"

[-] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 3 points 1 year ago

It's a space exploration game with thousands of planet, they can depict planet being a barren rock and can be fun.

Personally i don't think all games are good, arguing with people parroting that is a waste of time. Personally Witcher 3 is mediocre, but i'm allowing people to love it and see it as 10/10. Game is personal taste, if you don't like that sort of thing then it isn't for you, no such thing as "all game is good".

[-] Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago

can depict planet being a barren rock and can be fun.

And that will be good then. My point was, that games should sacrifice realism in favour of fun and criticism of "yeah it's boring, but it's realistic" is fundamentally wrong.

[-] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 1 points 1 year ago

I think in Starfield case it's less of sacrifice fun for realism and more of having these realism for a reason. From the review alone, the location is boring, and that's by design, because you can either ignore it or interact with it, like gather resource or build a base. There's thousands of planet, it's not realistic to all be handcrafted and interesting, because what's interesting for the first 10 times will get boring when you do it 50 times.

There's a reason why they design it that way, and i think it's rather fair for this sort of game.

[-] NuPNuA@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

That depends what you're going in expecting. Bethesda have been very clear that this isn't a Space Opera but more hard-sci-fi. I don't expect cities on every planet and alien political intrigue. I expect a cold, barren and uncaring universe that humans are trying to tame.

[-] Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago

And the only metrics here would be "is the game fun" in the end. Is exploring barren planets fun? Good. Is it not? Then it doesn't matter that real life Mars is even more boring

[-] NuPNuA@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Fun is subjective though isn't it?

[-] bermuda@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Not surprising to see them get complaints about this tbh. They went for "borderline horror game" with how much of a miserable wasteland Fallout 3 was and got blasted for it.

[-] Knusper@feddit.de 10 points 1 year ago

I mean, isn't it still only available to those who paid extra? That's probably why you see so many people wanting to discuss it without having played it yet...

[-] Renacles@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah, but maybe they should wait until the game is out before bashing it.

[-] Knusper@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

Personally, I try to see it positive. They want to protect others from being disappointed from yet another Bethesda game. I got burned by Skyrim in my youth, so when I see Todd Howard spitting straight lies again, I'll try to save others the disappointment.

Now that Starfield is public, I feel like people can at least try to form an own opinion, but if only the people who are willing to pay extra talk about it, then you've only got Bethesda fans talking.

this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2023
127 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

30616 readers
124 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS