1153
submitted 1 year ago by deconstruct@lemm.ee to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky has said the death of Yevgeny Prigozhin – the Russian mercenary leader whose plane crashed weeks after he led a mutiny against Moscow’s military leadership – shows what happens when people make deals with Russian leader Vladimir Putin.

As Ukraine’s counteroffensive moves into a fourth month, with only modest gains to show so far, Zelensky told CNN’s Fareed Zakaria he rejected suggestions it was time to negotiate peace with the Kremlin.

“When you want to have a compromise or a dialogue with somebody, you cannot do it with a liar,” Volodymyr Zelensky said.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 220 points 1 year ago

Withdrawing troops, returning stolen land, children, prisoners and paying for damages.. thats all i would accept. Nothing less.

[-] A1kmm@lemmy.amxl.com 41 points 1 year ago

A 'Treaty of Versailles' type solution is not a good idea for durable peace though, harsh reparations, despite any sense they might be 'fair', seldom lead to both countries returning to be prosperous democratic countries (and to be clear, neither is a capitulation by Ukraine - that would be seen by Putin as locking in its current gains, with no real incentive not to try again for more despite what the treaty might say).

The best outcome for everyone is if Russia ends up being a genuinely pluralistic democracy (i.e. anyone in Russia can have political views, and the public selects its leadership in free and fair elections). Then Ukraine can normalise relations with Russia, and Russia stops being a threat to democratic institutions across the world as a whole.

I think the best way of thinking about it is not that Ukraine has a Russia problem, but rather that Ukraine and Russia have an oligarch problem (with Putin chief amongst them). Therefore, in a fair world, the oligarchs, and not the Russian people, would pay. It is true that Russians (and indeed some Ukrainians in occupied regions) have been radicalised by the oligarchs, so some kind of deradicalisation would be needed even if the oligarchs disappeared.

Solutions that look to negotiate how to reduce corruption and authoritarianism in Russia from the top are therefore the most likely to succeed long term. Shorter term solutions could include a negotiated end to hostilities coupled with agreements for Ukraine to join a defensive alliance that the oligarchs wouldn't consider provoking - which could be followed up by a carrot approach to easing sanctions in exchange for progressive movements towards genuine Russian democracy. This might give oligarchs enough push to take off ramps to cash in what they have plundered already, and slowly be replaced by less corrupt alternatives going forward.

Recovery from oligarchy for Russia might also by costly for Russia though - essential assets plundered from the USSR are now in private hands through crony capitalism; the best solution would be for many of the major ones to go back to or be rebuilt under state ownership, under genuine democratic leadership. But that is likely easier said than done given the state of Russia.

[-] balderdash9@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 year ago

Solutions that look to negotiate how to reduce corruption and authoritarianism in Russia from the top are therefore the most likely to succeed long term.

This may be true but the negotiations are with a dictator. It's not like Putin is going to step down so that the problem is resolved peacefully.

[-] meldroc@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Yep. The only way to make progress on that front is to serve Putin some polonium tea...

[-] gnuhaut@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

That won't work, it's not just Putin doing this alone you know. You'd need a powerful (the most powerful, actually) faction inside the Russian state apparatus that want to just give up, and there's no real reason to think there is such a group. And no anti-war opposition has enough support to do a coup or win elections.

No defeatist is getting into power. It's not going to happen unless Lenin rises from the dead.

[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I bet if they had a real option, they'd love to stop sending their kids to die.

Saying as much now gets you thrown in jail.

[-] zephyreks@programming.dev 6 points 1 year ago

Socialism worked in Russia: it dragged hundreds of millions of people out of subsistence farming and turned the USSR into an economic powerhouse. Of course, the collapse of the USSR showed the failings of an aggressively socialist state, but the funny thing is that China already has the solution: a market-based economy with strong state control. Putin doesn't dare piss off the oligarchs though, so we're stuck with this crony bullshit.

[-] mwguy@infosec.pub 2 points 1 year ago

China's also showing the problem of that. The state control is too susceptible to corruption. That's how they have a whole industry if fake construction, fake goods etc... And why they're on the brink of a massive Construction bond related crash.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Cryan24@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago

And Russia Surrenders a 10km deep strip of its own land around Ukraine to act as a DMZ.

[-] zephyreks@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

With what military do you plan on using to support this?

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 year ago

And a 3rd party enforced DMZ on the border.

[-] flaneur@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If only you also were in the position to dictate this to Russia. Even the US isn't in this position, and will never be.

load more comments (52 replies)
this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2023
1153 points (97.1% liked)

World News

32523 readers
1176 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS