820
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jeena@jemmy.jeena.net 50 points 1 year ago

He's just saying what the Bourgeoisie has been thinking and doing since the beginning of capitalism, nothing new to see here.

[-] Hegar@kbin.social 29 points 1 year ago

Elites have been saying this well before capitalism. Capitalism sucks, but heirarchy is the problem.

[-] RealEarthHuman@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

Janet Yellen wrote a memo in 1996 about this.

https://theintercept.com/2023/01/24/unemployment-inflation-janet-yellen/

The rich want workers to have weak bargaining power. It's class warfare, plain and simple.

[-] abraxas@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Correct. This is why I have a problem with people (ironically, mostly poor) who call non-working people lazy. It's not laziness to insist on making somewhere near the value you produce. If a company makes $250,000/yr off an employee, it's unethical to nickel and dime then of making $30,000 to $40,000 or judge them for not working for $30,000.

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

It’s not laziness to insist on making somewhere near the value you produce

This is not why most non-working people don't work. Mostly it is childcare costs or disabilities.

If a company makes $250,000/yr off an employee, it’s unethical to nickel and dime then of making $30,000 to $40,000

People are paid based on the market value of their skills, not the value they provide the company. You sell your skills. If you don't have skills that cannot be found elsewhere (e.g. you do manual labor), your bargaining power is diluted because literally anyone can do your job.

This is the reason unions were invented.

[-] abraxas@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is not why most non-working people don’t work. Mostly it is childcare costs or disabilities.

Fair point, but for most it still amounts to making less than your work is worth.

People are paid based on the market value of their skills, not the value they provide the company.

Which is a breach of the EMH, and evidence the whole process fails. The more the Efficient Market Hypothesis is false, the more employees not having more leverage is a failure of capitalism. If goods are not traded somewhere near "real value", then supply and demand go from being the effective tool capitalists claim to being downright wasteful at best, and Police-Theft at worst.

And for the record, many people ARE paid based on the market value of their skills. Just ask fishermen. It's just still a minority payment structure because companies have no problem manipulating the labor pool, taking short-term losses to keep wages down. If you go back less than 100 years, they were doing it as blatantly as having towns where all goods in and out had to go through them and employees were paid in credit for those goods.

This is the reason unions were invented.

Unions are, and always will be, the small band-aid for big problems. I support them (though I've seen a few shifty ones who used non-voting workers as leverage for benefits for voting ones), but they will never solve the problem. A well-governed economy is one where the unions sit back and go "well shit, we got nothing to ask for because we already have it, and if we ask for more it'll bankrupt the employer". I'd like to point reference again to many classes of fishermen, paid in shares. You got 18 year old kids making $200,000/yr "unskilled" (scallopers, for reference), NOT because there's nobody else willing to do the job for less, but because they're paid by tradition based upon the value they create.

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Which is a breach of the EMH, and evidence the whole process fails

No it isn't, because,

If goods are not traded somewhere near “real value”, then supply and demand go from being the effective tool capitalists claim to being downright wasteful at best, and Police-Theft at worst.

This just shows your misunderstanding of the concept of value.

A well-governed economy is one where the unions sit back and go “well shit, we got nothing to ask for because we already have it, and if we ask for more it’ll bankrupt the employer”

Here we largely agree. Unions are kind of like the LGBTQ or deaf communities, in that ideally they would have no reason to exist.

As a side note you may want to consider that fishermen are paid well because it's not a job many people want to do or can do (as it is often dangerous and always tied to a specific locality) and thus competition for the role is not as broad, meaning wages go up exponentially. Same reason linemen, which is also about the same skill level, make so much money.

[-] abraxas@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago

Just because you don't agree (or didn't understand) with what I was saying about the concept of value doesn't mean I am misunderstanding it. You don't have a monopoly on how value works.

Have a great day. I don't intend to reply again.

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

I don’t intend to reply again.

Always cracks me up when people say this. Peace out bro, thanks for not sharing more misinformation. Have a great day yourself.

[-] TheWoozy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I would say that he's an aristocrat complaining about the uppity bourgeois. Many of the tech worker he's talking about are upper middle class.

[-] abraxas@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

The modern usage of the term Bourgeoisie typically does not reference "the middle class" but "the owning class". The wealth distribution of capitalism has changed since the 1780s.

Remember, in France there was a time where being a successful business owner had a ceiling because you couldn't easily buy power with money, so you were "middle-class".

this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
820 points (97.7% liked)

News

23669 readers
4998 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS